Trial reportThe Journal of emergency medicine2017
A Randomized Controlled Trial of a Citywide Emergency Department Care-Coordination Program to Reduce Prescription Opioid-Related Visits: An Economic Evaluation.
Trial report in The Journal of emergency medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Association between supportive interventions and healthcare utilization and outcomes in patients on long-term prescribed opioid therapy presenting to acute healthcare settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC emergency medicine · 2021Pooled it
- Real-Time Emergency Department Electronic Notifications Regarding High-Risk Patients: A Systematic Review.Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association · 2019Pooled it
- The benefits of health information exchange: an updated systematic review.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2018Pooled it
- Health Information Exchange between Specialists and General Practitioners Benefits Rural Patients.Applied clinical informatics · 2021Trial
- The digital divide among U.S. Hospitals delivering health services to populations with high social disparities.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
- A mapping review of interventions to address patients who frequently seek care in the emergency department.BMC emergency medicine · 2024Article
- Impact of primary to secondary care data sharing on care quality in NHS England hospitals.NPJ digital medicine · 2023Article
- The associations between query-based and directed health information exchange with potentially avoidable use of health care services.Health services research · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCare provided in the emergency department (ED) can cost up to five times as much as care received for comparable diagnoses in alternative settings. Small groups of patients, many of whom suffer from an opioid use disorder, often account for a large proportion of total ED visits. We recently conducted, and demonstrated the effectiveness of, the first randomized controlled trial of a citywide ED care-coordination program intending to reduce prescription-opioid-related ED visits. All EDs in the metropolitan study area were connected to a Web-based information exchange system.
objectiveThe objective of this article was to perform an economic evaluation of the 12-month trial from a third-party-payer perspective.
methodsWe modeled the person-period monthly for the 12-month observation period, and estimated total treatment costs and return on investment (ROI) with regard to cost offsets, over time, for all visits where the patient was admitted to and discharged from the ED.
resultsBy the end of month 4, the mean cumulative cost differential was significantly lower for intervention relative to treatment-as-usual participants (-$1370; p = 0.03); this figure climbed to -$3200 (p = 0.02) by the end of month 12. The ROI trended upward throughout the observation period, but failed to reach statistical significance by the end of month 12 (ROI = 3.39, p = 0.07).
conclusionThe intervention produced significant cost offsets by the end of month 4, which continued to accumulate throughout the trial; however, ROI was not significant. Because the per-patient administrative costs of the program are incurred at the time of enrollment, our results highlight the importance of future studies that are able to follow participants for a period beyond 12 months to more accurately estimate the program's ROI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.