Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28410960›Full record

Trial reportThe Journal of emergency medicine2017

A Randomized Controlled Trial of a Citywide Emergency Department Care-Coordination Program to Reduce Prescription Opioid-Related Visits: An Economic Evaluation.

Sean M Murphy, Donelle Howell, Sterling McPherson, Rebecca Grohs, John Roll, Darin Neven

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Journal of emergency medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Real-Time Emergency Department Electronic Notifications Regarding High-Risk Patients: A Systematic Review.Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association · 2019
    Pooled it
  3. The benefits of health information exchange: an updated systematic review.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2018
    Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sean M MurphyDepartment of Health Policy and Administration, Washington State University, Spokane, Washington; Program of Excellence in Addictions Research, Washington State University, Spokane, Washington.
Donelle HowellProgram of Excellence in Addictions Research, Washington State University, Spokane, Washington.
Sterling McPhersonProgram of Excellence in Addictions Research, Washington State University, Spokane, Washington.
Rebecca GrohsProgram of Excellence in Addictions Research, Washington State University, Spokane, Washington.
John RollProgram of Excellence in Addictions Research, Washington State University, Spokane, Washington.
Darin NevenProgram of Excellence in Addictions Research, Washington State University, Spokane, Washington.
Washington State University Spokane · US

Funding

Utilization of health services after engagement with opioid use disorder (OUD) treatment provider by individuals with and without post-traumatic stress disorderP30DA040500 · NIDA · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI Bruce R Schackman · 2015 to 2026
$20.7M
NIDA NIH HHS P30 DA040500
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCare provided in the emergency department (ED) can cost up to five times as much as care received for comparable diagnoses in alternative settings. Small groups of patients, many of whom suffer from an opioid use disorder, often account for a large proportion of total ED visits. We recently conducted, and demonstrated the effectiveness of, the first randomized controlled trial of a citywide ED care-coordination program intending to reduce prescription-opioid-related ED visits. All EDs in the metropolitan study area were connected to a Web-based information exchange system.

objectiveThe objective of this article was to perform an economic evaluation of the 12-month trial from a third-party-payer perspective.

methodsWe modeled the person-period monthly for the 12-month observation period, and estimated total treatment costs and return on investment (ROI) with regard to cost offsets, over time, for all visits where the patient was admitted to and discharged from the ED.

resultsBy the end of month 4, the mean cumulative cost differential was significantly lower for intervention relative to treatment-as-usual participants (-$1370; p = 0.03); this figure climbed to -$3200 (p = 0.02) by the end of month 12. The ROI trended upward throughout the observation period, but failed to reach statistical significance by the end of month 12 (ROI = 3.39, p = 0.07).

conclusionThe intervention produced significant cost offsets by the end of month 4, which continued to accumulate throughout the trial; however, ROI was not significant. Because the per-patient administrative costs of the program are incurred at the time of enrollment, our results highlight the importance of future studies that are able to follow participants for a period beyond 12 months to more accurately estimate the program's ROI.

Indexed as

Cooperative BehaviorAdultChi-Square DistributionContinuity of Patient CareCost-Benefit AnalysisCrowdingEmergency Service, HospitalEmergency TreatmentFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOpioid-Related Disorderseconomic evaluationED care coordinationfrequent ED usenonmedical prescription opioid use

Identifiers

PMID28410960
PMCPMC5572814
OpenAlexW2605448982

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.