ArticleStem cell reports2017
High-Throughput and Cost-Effective Characterization of Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells.
Article in Stem cell reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
36 citing papers in PubMed.
- Large-scale drug screening in iPSC-derived motor neurons from sporadic ALS patients identifies a potential combinatorial therapy.Nature neuroscience · 2026Article
- Protocol for generating human assembloids to investigate thalamocortical and corticothalamic synaptic transmission and plasticity.STAR protocols · 2025Article
- Article
- Multiplexed cytometry for single cell chemical biology.Methods in cell biology · 2025Article
- A comprehensive analysis of induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC) production and applications.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025Review
- Optical genome mapping of structural variants in Parkinson's disease-related induced pluripotent stem cells.BMC genomics · 2024Article
- Injectable biodegradable microcarriers for iPSC expansion and cardiomyocyte differentiation.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024Article
- Novel Approaches to Studying SLC13A5 Disease.Metabolites · 2024Review
- Sex-biased gene expression during neural differentiation of human embryonic stem cells.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2024Article
- Lessons learnt, and still to learn, in first in human stem cell trials.Stem cell reports · 2023Review
- Predicting reprogramming-related gene expression from cell morphology in human induced pluripotent stem cells.Molecular biology of the cell · 2023Article
- Review
- Bioprocess Economic Modeling: Decision Support Tools for the Development of Stem Cell Therapy Products.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Uncoupling of Proliferative Capacity from Developmental Stage During Directed Cardiac Differentiation of Pluripotent Stem Cells.Stem cells and development · 2022Article
- Droplet Microarray Based Screening Identifies Proteins for Maintaining Pluripotency of hiPSCs.Advanced healthcare materials · 2022Article
- The unfolded protein response links tumor aneuploidy to local immune dysregulation.EMBO reports · 2021Article
- An iPSC line derived from a human acute myeloid leukemia cell line (HL-60-iPSC) retains leukemic abnormalities and displays myeloid differentiation defects.Stem cell research · 2020Article
- Differentiation Induction of Human Stem Cells for Corneal Epithelial Regeneration.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Review
- A roadmap for neurodevelopmental disease modeling for non-stem cell biologists.Stem cells translational medicine · 2020Review
- The Challenge of Bringing iPSCs to the Patient.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Reprogramming somatic cells to induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) offers the possibility of studying the molecular mechanisms underlying human diseases in cell types difficult to extract from living patients, such as neurons and cardiomyocytes. To date, studies have been published that use small panels of iPSC-derived cell lines to study monogenic diseases. However, to study complex diseases, where the genetic variation underlying the disorder is unknown, a sizable number of patient-specific iPSC lines and controls need to be generated. Currently the methods for deriving and characterizing iPSCs are time consuming, expensive, and, in some cases, descriptive but not quantitative. Here we set out to develop a set of simple methods that reduce cost and increase throughput in the characterization of iPSC lines. Specifically, we outline methods for high-throughput quantification of surface markers, gene expression analysis of in vitro differentiation potential, and evaluation of karyotype with markedly reduced cost.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.