ArticleBMC medical research methodology2017
Practical application of opt-out recruitment methods in two health services research studies.
Article in BMC medical research methodology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trial
- Recruitment and enrollment of participants in an online diabetes self-management intervention in a virtual environment.Contemporary clinical trials · 2021Trial
- Article
- Article
- Gamified Optimized Diabetes Management With Artificial Intelligence-Powered Rural Telehealth Intervention (GODART): Protocol for an Optimization Pilot and Feasibility Trial.JMIR research protocols · 2025Article
- Improving the reporting on health equity in observational research (STROBE-Equity): extension checklist and elaboration.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2025Article
- Integrating public engagement to promote transparent data use in a new UK-wide birth cohort.International journal of population data science · 2025Article
- Secondary analysis of electronic opt-out consent in pragmatic research: A study design method to diversify clinical trials?American heart journal · 2023Article
- Veterans' Experiences With Accessing Community Emergency Care.Military medicine · 2023Article
- Enhancing study recruitment through implementation of an opt-out, cold contact process with consideration for autonomy, beneficence and justice.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2023Article
- Initial concurrent and convergent validity of the Perceived Access Inventory (PAI) for mental health services.Psychological services · 2022Article
- Impact of Attitudes and Rurality on Veterans' Use of Veterans Health Administration Mental Health Services.Psychiatric services (Washington, D.C.) · 2021Article
- Enhancing sleep quality for nursing home residents with dementia: a pragmatic randomized controlled trial of an evidence-based frontline huddling program.BMC geriatrics · 2021Article
- Veteran Perspectives on Care Coordination Between Veterans Affairs and Community Providers: A Qualitative Analysis.The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association · 2021Article
- Record linkage of population-based cohort data from minors with national register data: a scoping review and comparative legal analysis of four European countries.Open research Europe · 2021Article
- Development of the Perceived Access Inventory: A patient-centered measure of access to mental health care.Psychological services · 2020Article
- Veterans' experiences initiating VA-based mental health care.Psychological services · 2019Article
- Development of a Perceived Access Inventory for Community Care Mental Healthcare Services for Veterans.Military medicine · 2019Article
- Patient perspectives on use of electronic health records for research recruitment.BMC medical research methodology · 2019Article
- Engaging patients throughout the health system: A landscape analysis of cold-call policies and recommendations for future policy change.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundParticipant recruitment is an ongoing challenge in health research. Recruitment may be especially difficult for studies of access to health care because, even among those who are in care, people using services least often also may be hardest to contact and recruit. Opt-out recruitment methods (in which potential participants are given the opportunity to decline further contact about the study (opt out) following an initial mailing, and are then contacted directly if they have not opted out within a specified period) can be used for such studies. However, there is a dearth of literature on the effort needed for effective opt-out recruitment.
methodsIn this paper we describe opt-out recruitment procedures for two studies on access to health care within the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs. We report resource requirements for recruitment efforts (number of opt-out packets mailed and number of phone calls made). We also compare the characteristics of study participants to potential participants via t-tests, Fisher's exact tests, and chi-squared tests.
resultsRecruitment rates for our two studies were 12 and 21%, respectively. Across multiple study sites, we had to send between 4.3 and 9.2 opt-out packets to recruit one participant. The number of phone calls required to arrive at a final status for each potentially eligible Veteran (i.e. study participation or the termination of recruitment efforts) were 2.9 and 6.1 in the two studies, respectively. Study participants differed as expected from the population of potentially eligible Veterans based on planned oversampling of certain subpopulations. The final samples of participants did not differ statistically from those who were mailed opt-out packets, with one exception: in one of our two studies, participants had higher rates of mental health service use in the past year than did those mailed opt-out packets (64 vs. 47%).
conclusionsOur results emphasize the practicality of using opt-out methods for studies of access to health care. Despite the benefits of these methods, opt-out alone may be insufficient to eliminate non-response bias on key variables. Researchers will need to balance considerations of sample representativeness and feasibility when designing studies investigating access to care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.