Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28410405›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2017

Real-world treatment patterns for patients receiving second-line and third-line treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer: A systematic review of recently published studies.

Jessica Davies, Manali Patel, Cesare Gridelli, Filippo de Marinis, Daniel Waterkamp, Margaret E McCusker

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
11.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 89 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. First-Line Selpercatinib or Chemotherapy and Pembrolizumab inThe New England journal of medicine · 2023
    Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Jessica DaviesF. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Welwyn Garden City, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1098-2138
Manali PatelDivision of Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, United States of America.
Cesare GridelliDivision of Medical Oncology, "S.G. Moscati" Hospital, Avellino, Italy.
Filippo de MarinisDivision of Thoracic Oncology, European Institute of Oncology (IEO), Milan, Italy.
Daniel WaterkampDiagnostics Information Solutions, F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG, Pleasanton, California, United States of America.
Margaret E McCuskerDiagnostics Information Solutions, F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG, Pleasanton, California, United States of America.
Roche (United States) · USAzienda Ospedaliera S.Giuseppe Moscati · ITEuropean Institute of Oncology · ITRoche (United Kingdom) · GBStanford University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Most patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have a poor prognosis and receive limited benefit from conventional treatments, especially in later lines of therapy. In recent years, several novel therapies have been approved for second- and third-line treatment of advanced NSCLC. In light of these approvals, it is valuable to understand the uptake of these new treatments in routine clinical practice and their impact on patient care. A systematic literature search was conducted in multiple scientific databases to identify observational cohort studies published between January 2010 and March 2017 that described second- or third-line treatment patterns and clinical outcomes in patients with advanced NSCLC. A qualitative data synthesis was performed because a meta-analysis was not possible due to the heterogeneity of the study populations. A total of 12 different study cohorts in 15 articles were identified. In these cohorts, single-agent chemotherapy was the most commonly administered treatment in both the second- and third-line settings. In the 5 studies that described survival from the time of second-line treatment initiation, median overall survival ranged from 4.6 months (95% CI, 3.8-5.7) to 12.8 months (95% CI, 10.7-14.5). There was limited information on the use of biomarker-directed therapy in these patient populations. This systematic literature review offers insights into the adoption of novel therapies into routine clinical practice for second- and third-line treatment of patients with advanced NSCLC. This information provides a valuable real-world context for the impact of recently approved treatments for advanced NSCLC.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsBiomarkers, TumorCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungDatabases, FactualDrug Therapy, CombinationHumansLung NeoplasmsNeoplasm StagingProtein Kinase InhibitorsSurvival RateAntineoplastic AgentsBiomarkers, TumorProtein Kinase Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID28410405
PMCPMC5391942
OpenAlexW2606328036

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.