Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28410173›Full record

ArticleJMIR cancer2016

eHealth in Modern Patient-Caregiver Communication: High Rate of Acceptance Among Physicians for Additional Support of Breast Cancer Patients During Long-Term Therapy.

Thomas Kirkovits, Timo Schinkoethe, Caroline Drewes, Caroline Gehring, Ingo Bauerfeind, Nadia Harbeck, Rachel Wuerstlein

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR cancer, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Application of Ethics for Providing Telemedicine Services and Information Technology.Medical archives (Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina) · 2017
    Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Thomas KirkovitsBreast Center, University Hospital Munich, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Ludwig Maximilian University, Munich, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1731-8408
Timo SchinkoetheBreast Center, University Hospital Munich, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Ludwig Maximilian University, Munich, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2008-6775
Caroline DrewesBreast Center, University Hospital Munich, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Ludwig Maximilian University, Munich, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8198-634X
Caroline GehringBreast Center, University Hospital Munich, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Ludwig Maximilian University, Munich, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1961-2790
Ingo BauerfeindBreast Center, Landshut Hospital, Department of Gynecology, Landshut, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7916-0204
Nadia HarbeckBreast Center, University Hospital Munich, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Ludwig Maximilian University, Munich, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9744-7372
Rachel WuerstleinBreast Center, University Hospital Munich, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Ludwig Maximilian University, Munich, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7268-0840

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLack of adherence and compliance with drug regimens among breast cancer patients represent substantial problems in oral therapies, leading to significant impacts on mortality. Where other systems have failed, electronic health (eHealth) could be a possible solution to improve medication intake, along with the doctor-patient relationship. Initial results from studies concerning new interventions for therapy support are promising, but reports suggest that general acceptance of new treatment support tools is needed among patients and physicians alike.

objectiveThe aim of this study was to investigate the actual use of the Internet and other modern media among physicians involved in breast cancer treatment.

methodsUsing a standardized questionnaire, actual utilization of new media among physicians was analyzed. Internet-related behaviors in private, as well as in business life, were investigated. Attention was focused on physicians' opinions regarding modern eHealth tools and how patients could be best supported to enhance adherence.

resultsA total of 120 physicians, all participating in breast cancer care, completed the questionnaire (median age 41 years). Almost all participants (99.2%, 119/120) used the Internet for general purposes and 98.3% (118/120) used it for medical issues as well. Virtually all medical professionals (99.2%, 119/120) reported that they owned a computer, while more recently invented technologies such as tablets and smartphones were owned by 31.9% (38/119) and 73.1% (87/119), respectively. The Internet was favored by 66.4% (79/119) of the physicians in our survey as a source for patient support; 71.2% (84/118) would also favor modern media for side effect registration. Based on our analysis, the most frequent Internet-utilizing physicians were characterized by age <60, worked in a hospital, and were employed as a junior physician.

conclusionsThis study demonstrated a high usage of Internet-related technologies among physicians, indicating that the use of eHealth for advanced and individualized support in breast cancer care is a promising addition to treatment management. Such technologies have the potential to enhance adherence and compliance in therapy among cancer patients.

Indexed as

acceptancebreast cancereHealthmobile healthpatient adherencepatient compliancephysicianstelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID28410173
PMCPMC5367844

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.