ArticleJournal of neuro-oncology2017
Single fraction spine stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy with volumetric modulated arc therapy.
Article in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03984435 (A Qualitative Study Exploring Patient Experiences of Comfort During Radiotherapy and Radiographer Views of Managing Patient Comfort During the Delivery of Radiotherapy), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Qualitative Study Exploring Patient Experiences of Comfort During Radiotherapy and Radiographer Views of Managing Patient Comfort During the Delivery of Radiotherapy
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Stereotactic body radiotherapy for treatment of spinal metastasis: A systematic review of the literature.Neuro-oncology advances · 2024Review
- Stereotactic body radiation therapy for spinal metastases: A new standard of care.Neuro-oncology · 2024Review
- Multidisciplinary management of spinal metastases: what the radiologist needs to know.The British journal of radiology · 2022Review
- Local control and vertebral compression fractures following stereotactic body radiotherapy for spine metastases.Journal of bone oncology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study investigated a single institution's experience with volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) directed stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) for vertebral metastases. From 2010 to 2014, 95 lesions of spinal metastases in 73 patients were treated with SABR using VMAT. Clinical local control, pain level, and use of steroid medication were employed to evaluate treatment responses. The majority (79%) of patients were treated with a radiation dose of 20 Gy in a single fraction. However, when normal tissue constraints could not be achieved, the dose was reduced to 18 Gy (11%) or 16 Gy (8%) in 1 fraction. At the median follow up of 12.7 months (mean 18.0, range 1-56 months), clinical local control was 97% (92 out of 95). There was a mean 81% (median 100%, range 28-100%) decrease in subjective pain score. Seventy-seven percent of patients had a decrease in narcotic pain medication use. Pain was completely resolved at the treatment site for 69% (66/95) of patients. Prior to the SABR treatment, 33% (31/95) of patients had epidural extension of tumor. Among patients with epidural involvement, 45% (14/31) exhibited neurologic impairment prior to treatment. Twenty-three percent (7/31) experienced spinal cord compression. Prior to treatment, 34 patients experienced some form of neurologic impairment. Of these patients, 24% (8/34) experienced improved motor functioning; the remaining 76% (26/34) of patients' neurological dysfunction were stable. Our results indicate the SABR regimen using VMAT technique is clinically effective in achieving clinical local control and palliation. This is the first publication reporting clinical outcomes of VMAT directed SABR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.