SynthesisActa neurochirurgica2017
Stereotactic radiosurgery vs. fractionated radiotherapy for tumor control in vestibular schwannoma patients: a systematic review.
Synthesis in Acta neurochirurgica, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
43 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 106 citations in OpenAlex.
- The relationship between extent of resection, tumor recurrence, and facial nerve outcomes in vestibular schwannoma surgery: a single-institution experience and systematic review.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2025Pooled it
- Single-fraction radiosurgery outcomes for large vestibular schwannomas in the upfront or post-surgical setting: a systematic review and International Stereotactic Radiosurgery Society (ISRS) Practice Guidelines.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2023Pooled it
- Stereotactic radiosurgery for vestibular schwannomas in neurofibromatosis type 2 patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2022Pooled it
- EANO guideline on the diagnosis and treatment of vestibular schwannoma.Neuro-oncology · 2020Guideline
- Clinical management of vestibular schwannoma - what's the evidence?Acta neurochirurgica · 2026Review
- Volumetric and Linear Imaging Response After Stereotactic Radiotherapy for Vestibular Schwannoma.Cureus · 2025Article
- Predictors of Growth of Vestibular Schwannoma After Gamma Knife Treatment: A Systematic Review.Cancers · 2025Review
- Evaluation of Vestibular Schwannoma Size across Time: How Well Do the Experts Perform and What Can Be Improved?AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2025Article
- A retrospective study demonstrating the growth patterns and the pseudoprogression temporal classification after stereotactic radiosurgery for sporadic vestibular schwannomas.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Imaging Findings Post-Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Vestibular Schwannoma: A Primer for the Radiologist.AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2024Review
- Controversies in neuro-oncology: Focal proton versus photon radiation therapy for adult brain tumors.Neuro-oncology practice · 2024Review
- Hearing Improvement after Radiation Therapy for a Facial Nerve Schwannoma: Report of a Case and Review of Literature.Journal of neurological surgery reports · 2024Article
- The Recent Management of Vestibular Schwannoma Radiotherapy: A Narrative Review of the Literature.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Evolution in the management of vestibular schwannoma: a single-center 15-year experience.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2023Article
- COX inhibitor use during definitive radiotherapy is associated with worse hearing preservation in patients with vestibular schwannoma.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2023Article
- Clinical outcomes and safety of large or giant vestibular schwannoma in older patients undergoing microsurgery: a matched cohort study.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2023Article
- Proton Radiotherapy for Vestibular Schwannomas in Patients with NF2-Related Schwannomatosis: A Case Series.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2023Article
- A bibliometric and visualization analysis of global research on vestibular schwannoma.American journal of translational research · 2023Article
- Planning issues on linac-based stereotactic radiotherapy.World journal of clinical cases · 2022Review
- Factors Influencing Personalized Management of Vestibular Schwannoma: A Systematic Review.Journal of personalized medicine · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveRepeated controlled studies have revealed that stereotactic radiosurgery is better than microsurgery for patients with vestibular schwannoma (VS) <3 cm in need of intervention. In this systematic review we aimed to compare results from single-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) to fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (FSRT) for patients with VS. DATA SOURCES AND ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: We systematically searched MEDLINE, Web of Science, Embase and Cochrane and screened relevant articles for references. Publications from 1995 through 2014 with a minimum of 50 adult (>18 years) patients with unilateral VS, followed for a median of >5 years, were eligible for inclusion. After screening titles and abstracts of the 1094 identified articles and systematically reviewing 98 of these articles, 19 were included.
interventionPatients with unilateral VS treated with radiosurgery were compared to patients treated with fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy.
resultsNo randomized controlled trial (RCT) was identified. None of the identified controlled studies comparing SRS with FSRT were eligible according to the inclusion criteria. Nineteen case series on SRS (n = 17) and FSRT (n = 2) were included in the systematic review. Loss of tumor control necessitating a new VS-targeted intervention was found in an average of 5.0% of the patients treated with SRS and in 4.8% treated with FSRT. Mean deterioration ratio for patients with serviceable hearing before treatment was 49% for SRS and 45% for FSRT, respectively. The risk for facial nerve deterioration was 3.6% for SRS and 11.2% for FSRT and for trigeminal nerve deterioration 6.0% for SRS and 8.4% for FSRT. Since these results were obtained from case series, a regular meta-analysis was not attempted.
conclusionSRS and FSRT are both noninvasive treatment alternatives for patients with VS with low rates of treatment failure in need of rescue therapy. In this selection of patients, the progression-free survival rates were on the order of 92-100% for both treatment options. There is a lack of high-quality studies comparing radiation therapy alternatives for patients with VS. Finally, 19 articles reported long-term tumor control after SRS, while only 2 articles reported long-term FSRT results, making effect estimates more uncertain for FSRT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.