Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28409314›Full record

ReviewResults and problems in cell differentiation

Regulation of Asymmetric Cell Division in Mammalian Neural Stem and Cancer Precursor Cells.

Mathieu Daynac, Claudia K Petritsch

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Results and problems in cell differentiation. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Transcriptional Control of Apical-Basal Polarity Regulators.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mathieu DaynacDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Brain Tumor Research Center, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Claudia K PetritschDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Brain Tumor Research Center, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA. Claudia.Petritsch@ucsf.edu.
University of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

BRAF Mutation in Malignant Astrocytoma Origin, Evolution, and Response to TherapyR01NS080619 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI JAMES, CHARLES DAVID, PETRITSCH, CLAUDIA KATHARINA · 2012 to 2016
$1.8M
A causal role for asymmetric cell division defects in glioma initiationR01CA164746 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI PETRITSCH, CLAUDIA KATHARINA · 2012 to 2016
$1.6M
Investigating ASPM regulation of asymmetric division for therapeutic opportunitiesR21NS099836 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI PETRITSCH, CLAUDIA KATHARINA · 2016 to 2017
$436k
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA164746NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS080619NINDS NIH HHS R21 NS099836
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stem and progenitor cells are characterized by their abilities to self-renew and produce differentiated progeny. The balance between self-renewal and differentiation is achieved through control of cell division mode, which can be either asymmetric or symmetric. Failure to properly control cell division mode may result in premature depletion of the stem/progenitor cell pool or abnormal growth and impaired differentiation. In many tissues, including the brain, stem cells and progenitor cells undergo asymmetric cell division through the establishment of cell polarity. Cell polarity proteins are therefore potentially critical regulators of asymmetric cell division. Decrease or loss of asymmetric cell division can be associated with reduced differentiation common during aging or impaired remyelination as seen in demyelinating diseases. Progenitor-like glioma precursor cells show decreased asymmetric cell division rates and increased symmetric divisions, which suggests that asymmetric cell division suppresses brain tumor formation. Cancer stem cells, on the other hand, still undergo low rates of asymmetric cell division, which may provide them with a survival advantage during therapy. These findings led to the hypotheses that asymmetric cell divisions are not always tumor suppressive but can also be utilized to maintain a cancer stem cell population. Proper control of cell division mode is therefore not only deemed necessary to generate cellular diversity during development and to maintain adult tissue homeostasis but may also prevent disease and determine disease progression. Since brain cancer is most common in the adult and aging population, we review here the current knowledge on molecular mechanisms that regulate asymmetric cell divisions in the neural and oligodendroglial lineage during development and in the adult brain.

Indexed as

AnimalsAsymmetric Cell DivisionHumansNeoplastic Stem CellsNeural Stem Cells

Identifiers

PMID28409314
PMCPMC12940715
OpenAlexW2605854429

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.