Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28409252›Full record

ReviewPediatric radiology2017

Pediatric brain MRI, Part 2: Advanced techniques.

Mai-Lan Ho, Norbert G Campeau, Thang D Ngo, Unni K Udayasankar, Kirk M Welker

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Pediatric radiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Contrast-enhanced TScientific reports · 2026
    Article
  4. Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mai-Lan HoDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St. SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA. ho.mai-lan@mayo.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9455-1350
Norbert G CampeauDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St. SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
Thang D NgoDepartment of Radiology, Nemours Children's Hospital, Orlando, FL, USA.
Unni K UdayasankarDepartment of Radiology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.
Kirk M WelkerDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St. SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pediatric neuroimaging is a complex and specialized field that uses magnetic resonance (MR) imaging as the workhorse for diagnosis. MR protocols should be tailored to the specific indication and reviewed by the supervising radiologist in real time. Targeted advanced imaging sequences can be added to provide information regarding tissue microstructure, perfusion, metabolism and function. In part 2 of this review, we highlight the utility of advanced imaging techniques for superior evaluation of pediatric neurologic disease. We focus on the following techniques, with clinical examples: phase-contrast imaging, perfusion-weighted imaging, vessel wall imaging, diffusion tensor imaging, task-based functional MRI and MR spectroscopy.

Indexed as

BrainBrain DiseasesChildHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeuroimagingBrainChildrenDiffusion tensor imagingFunctional magnetic resonance imagingMagnetic resonance spectroscopyPerfusion-weighted imagingPhase-contrast

Identifiers

PMID28409252

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.