Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28409233›Full record

Trial reportWiener klinische Wochenschrift2017

Effects of a web-based follow-up intervention on self-efficacy in obesity treatment for women.

Sonja Rader, Thomas Ernst Dorner, Rudolf Schoberberger, Hilde Wolf

Abstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Wiener klinische Wochenschrift, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sonja RaderWomen's Health Centre - FEM Süd, Kaiser Franz Josef - Hospital Vienna, Kundratstrasse 3, 1100, Vienna, Austria. sonja.rader@wienkav.at.
Thomas Ernst DornerInstitute of Social Medicine, Centre for Public Health, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Rudolf SchoberbergerInstitute of Social Medicine, Centre for Public Health, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Hilde WolfWomen's Health Centre - FEM Süd, Kaiser Franz Josef - Hospital Vienna, Kundratstrasse 3, 1100, Vienna, Austria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Obesity is a chronic disease requiring long-term care. The purpose of the current study was the evaluation of a web-based intervention (WBI), subsequent to an initial face to face life style treatment. In a randomized trial, 84 women received an introduction phase (4 months) and a training phase (2 months) where one group was trained in using WBI whereas the other arm received a printed manual (PMI). During the self-monitoring phase (6 months) participants either used the WBI or the PMI for follow-up support. Anthropometric parameters could be significantly reduced and self-efficacy was significantly increased in the first 6 months. At 12 months, values of self-efficacy of the WBI were not superior compared to results of the PMI; however, feedback on acceptability of the intervention did show higher ratings of the WBI and also facilitated contact with the program supervisor. No significant differences regarding the engagement in follow-up tools could be found between the intervention groups. Subgroup analysis indicated a positive effect of involvement in both forms of self-monitoring aftercare.

Indexed as

InternetSelf EfficacyAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnthropometryAustriaFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansLong-Term CareManuals as TopicMiddle AgedObesityObesity Managemente-HealthFollow-up supportObesitySelf-efficacyWeb-based intervention

Identifiers

PMID28409233
PMCPMC5506199

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.