Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28409227›Full record

ArticleOecologia2017

Evolutionary responses to climate change in a range expanding plant.

Mirka Macel, Tomáš Dostálek, Sonja Esch, Anna Bucharová, Nicole M van Dam, Katja Tielbörger, Koen J F Verhoeven, Zuzana Münzbergová

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oecologia, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Climate change effects on animal ecology: butterflies and moths as a case study.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2021
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Mirka MacelPlant Ecology, University of Tübingen, Auf der Morgenstelle 5, 72076, Tübingen, Germany. mirkamacel@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-4122-6797
Tomáš DostálekDepartment of Botany, Faculty of Science, Charles University in Prague, Benátská 2, 128 01, Prague 2, Czech Republic.
Sonja EschInstitute of Biology, Leiden University, P.O. Box 9505, 2300 RA, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Anna BucharováPlant Evolutionary Ecology, University of Tübingen, Auf der Morgenstelle 5, 72076, Tübingen, Germany.
Nicole M van DamMolecular Interactions Ecology, German Centre for Integrative Biodiverisity Research (iDiv), Deutscher Platz 5e, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.
Katja TielbörgerPlant Ecology, University of Tübingen, Auf der Morgenstelle 5, 72076, Tübingen, Germany.
Koen J F VerhoevenTerrestrial Ecology, Netherlands Institute of Ecology (NIOO-KNAW), Droevendaalsesteeg 10, 6708 PB, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Zuzana MünzbergováDepartment of Botany, Faculty of Science, Charles University in Prague, Benátská 2, 128 01, Prague 2, Czech Republic.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To understand the biological effects of climate change, it is essential to take into account species' evolutionary responses to their changing environments. Ongoing climate change is resulting in species shifting their geographical distribution ranges poleward. We tested whether a successful range expanding plant has rapidly adapted to the regional conditions in its novel range, and whether adaptation could be driven by herbivores. Furthermore, we investigated if enemy release occurred in the newly colonized areas and whether plant origins differed in herbivore resistance. Plants were cloned and reciprocally transplanted between three experimental sites across the range. Effects of herbivores on plant performance were tested by individually caging plants with either open or closed cages. There was no indication of (regional) adaptation to abiotic conditions. Plants originating from the novel range were always larger than plants from the core distribution at all experimental sites, with or without herbivory. Herbivore damage was highest and not lowest at the experimental sites in the novel range, suggesting no release from enemy impact. Genotypes from the core were more damaged compared to genotypes from newly colonized areas at the most northern site in the novel range, which was dominated by generalist slug herbivory. We also detected subtle shifts in chemical defenses between the plant origins. Genotypes from the novel range had more inducible defenses. Our results suggest that plants that are expanding their range with climate change may evolve increased vigor and altered herbivore resistance in their new range, analogous to invasive plants.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionClimate ChangePlantsHerbivoryBiotic interactionsGlobal changeHerbivoresInsectsRorippa austriaca

Identifiers

PMID28409227
PMCPMC5487849

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.