Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28409224›Full record

SynthesisInternational archives of occupational and environmental health2017

Occupational exposure to respirable crystalline silica and chronic non-malignant renal disease: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Matthias Möhner, Anne Pohrt, Johannes Gellissen

Open access · hybridAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International archives of occupational and environmental health, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Caplan's Syndrome with a twist.International journal of clinical case reports and reviews : open access · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Fossil Shell Flour in Livestock Production: A Review.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2019
    Review
  17. Particulate Matter (Fine Particle) and Urologic Diseases.International neurourology journal · 2017
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Matthias MöhnerDivision of Work and Health, Federal Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Nöldnerstr. 40/42, 10317, Berlin, Germany. Moehner.Matthias@baua.bund.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3225-5879
Anne PohrtDivision of Work and Health, Federal Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Nöldnerstr. 40/42, 10317, Berlin, Germany.
Johannes GellissenDivision of Work and Health, Federal Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Nöldnerstr. 40/42, 10317, Berlin, Germany.
Federal Institute for Occupational Safety and Health · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWhile occupational exposure to respirable silica is known to lead to lung disease, most notably silicosis, its association with chronic kidney disease is unclear.

objectivesThis review explores the association between occupational exposure to respirable silica and chronic non-malignant renal disease such as glomerulonephritis. The evidence has been collected and compiled. Possible sources of bias are thoroughly discussed.

methodsCohort studies with silica exposure and case-control studies of renal disease were searched in PubMed until January 2015. Two authors independently abstracted data; any disagreement was resolved by consulting a third reviewer. A meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the association to silica exposure.

resultsA total of 23 cohort and four case-control studies were included in the analysis. The meta-analysis of cohort studies yielded elevated overall SMRs for renal disease. Some studies, however, included dose-response analyses, most of which did not show a positive trend. The approaches and results of the case-control studies were very heterogeneous.

conclusionsWhile the studies of cohorts exposed to silica found elevated SMRs for renal disease, no clear evidence of a dose-response relationship emerged. The elevated risk may be attributed to diagnostic and methodological issues. In order to permit a reliable estimation of a possible causal link, exposed cohorts should be monitored for renal disease, as the information from mortality studies is hardly reliable in this field.

Indexed as

Case-Control StudiesCohort StudiesDose-Response Relationship, DrugGlomerulonephritisHumansInhalation ExposureOccupational DiseasesOccupational ExposureRenal Insufficiency, ChronicRisk AssessmentSilicon DioxideSilicon DioxideChronic renal diseaseMeta-analysisRespirable silicaReviewSMR

Identifiers

PMID28409224
PMCPMC5583269
OpenAlexW2605474266

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.