Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28409148›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in pediatrics2017

Position Paper of INoEA Working Group on Long-Gap Esophageal Atresia: For Better Care.

David C van der Zee, Pietro Bagolan, Christophe Faure, Frederic Gottrand, Russell Jennings, Jean-Martin Laberge, Marcela Hernan Martinez Ferro, Benoît Parmentier, Rony Sfeir, Warwick Teague

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Management of long-gap esophageal atresia.Translational pediatrics · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

David C van der ZeeDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, UMC Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Pietro BagolanDepartment of Medical and Surgical Neonatology, Newborn Surgery Unit, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital-Research Institute Rome, Rome, Italy.
Christophe FaureDepartment of Pediatrics, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Frederic GottrandPôle enfant, Hôpital J de Flandre CHRU de Lille, Lille, France.
Russell JenningsDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Jean-Martin LabergeMontréal Children's Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Marcela Hernan Martinez FerroDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, J. P. Garrahan National Children's Hospital, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Benoît ParmentierDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, Robert Debré University Hospital, APHP, Paris, France.
Rony SfeirDepartment of Surgery, Jeanne de Flandre Hospital, Lille, France.
Warwick TeagueDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, The Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

INoEA is the International Network of Esophageal Atresia and consists of a broad spectrum of pediatric specialties and patient societies. The working group on long-gap esophageal atresia (LGEA) set out to develop guidelines regarding the definition of LGEA, the best diagnostic and treatment strategies, and highlight the necessity of experience and communication in the management of these challenging patients. Review of the literature and expert discussion concluded that LGEA should be defined as any esophageal atresia (EA) that has no intra-abdominal air, realizing that this defines EA with no distal tracheoesophageal fistula (TEF). LGEA is considerably more complex than EA with distal TEFs and should be referred to a center of expertise. The first choice is to preserve the native esophagus and pursue primary repair, delayed primary anastomosis, or traction/growth techniques to achieve anastomosis. A cervical esophagostomy should be avoided if possible. Only if primary anastomosis is not possible, replacement techniques should be used. Jejunal interposition is proposed as the best option among the major EA centers. In light of the infrequent occurrence of LGEA and the technically demanding techniques involved to achieve esophageal continuity, it is strongly advised to develop regional or national centers of expertise for the management and follow-up of these very complex patients.

Indexed as

centers of expertisedefinitiondiagnosislong-gap esophageal atresiamanagement

Identifiers

PMID28409148
PMCPMC5374143

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.