Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28409066›Full record

ArticleCureus2017

Giant Arachnoid Granulation Associated with Anomalous Draining Vein: A Case Report.

Randle Umeh, Rod J Oskouian, Marios Loukas, R Shane Tubbs

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Giant Arachnoid Granulations: A Systematic Literature Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Randle UmehDepartment of Anatomical Sciences, St. George's University School of Medicine, Grenada, West Indies.
Rod J OskouianSwedish Neuroscience Institute.
Marios LoukasDepartment of Anatomical Sciences, St. George's University School of Medicine, Grenada, West Indies.
R Shane TubbsNeurosurgery, Seattle Science Foundation.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Giant arachnoid granulations (AG) can mimic intracranial lesions. Knowledge of these structures can help avoid misdiagnosis when interpreting imaging. Here, we report a child who presented with a mass within the superior sagittal sinus and an anomalous draining vein. Herein, the diagnosis of a giant AG was made. Clinicians who view or interpret imaging of the head should be aware of these anatomical variants and though when very large, apparently, do not necessarily result in pathology. Based on our case report, giant AG might also demonstrate anomalous draining veins.

Indexed as

anatomyarachnoid matterdural venous sinusintracranialvariation

Identifiers

PMID28409066
PMCPMC5375954

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.