Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28409062›Full record

ArticleNeurology. Clinical practice2017

Improved availability and quality of care with epilepsy nurse practitioners.

Chloe E Hill, Bethany Thomas, Kimberly Sansalone, Kathryn A Davis, Judy A Shea, Brian Litt, Nabila Dahodwala

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurology. Clinical practice, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Classifying epilepsy pragmatically: Past, present, and future.Journal of the neurological sciences · 2021
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Development of an Epilepsy Nursing Communication Tool: Improving the Quality of Interactions Between Nurses and Patients With Seizures.The Journal of neuroscience nursing : journal of the American Association of Neuroscience Nurses · 2018
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Chloe E HillDepartments of Neurology (CEH, BT, KS, KAD, BL, ND) and Medicine (JAS), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Bethany ThomasDepartments of Neurology (CEH, BT, KS, KAD, BL, ND) and Medicine (JAS), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Kimberly SansaloneDepartments of Neurology (CEH, BT, KS, KAD, BL, ND) and Medicine (JAS), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Kathryn A DavisDepartments of Neurology (CEH, BT, KS, KAD, BL, ND) and Medicine (JAS), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Judy A SheaDepartments of Neurology (CEH, BT, KS, KAD, BL, ND) and Medicine (JAS), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Brian LittDepartments of Neurology (CEH, BT, KS, KAD, BL, ND) and Medicine (JAS), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Nabila DahodwalaDepartments of Neurology (CEH, BT, KS, KAD, BL, ND) and Medicine (JAS), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
University of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

Neurologic Clinical Epidemiology Training ProgramT32NS061779 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Andrea Lauren Christman Schneider, Allison Willis · 2008 to 2026
$4.6M
Localizing epileptic networks using novel 7T MRI glutamate imagingK23NS092973 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI DAVIS, KATHRYN ADAMIAK · 2016 to 2020
$980k
NINDS NIH HHS K23 NS092973NINDS NIH HHS T32 NS061779
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study investigated the quality of care delivered by nurse practitioner (NP)-physician teams employed to expand clinic appointment availability for patients with epilepsy.

methodsWe performed a retrospective observational cohort study of patients with epilepsy presenting to the Penn Epilepsy Center for a new patient appointment in 2014. During this time, patients were seen either by an NP-physician team care model or a more traditional physician-only care model. These care models were compared with regard to adherence to the 2014 American Academy of Neurology epilepsy quality measures at the initial visit. Clinical outcomes of seizure frequency, presentations to the Emergency Department, injury, and death were assessed over the subsequent year.

resultsA total of 169 patients were identified by our inclusion and exclusion criteria: 65 patients in the NP-physician team care model cohort and 104 patients in the physician-only care model cohort. The NP-physician team care model saw, on average, 3 more patients per clinic session. There were no meaningful differences between these cohorts in baseline characteristics. The NP-physician team care model showed equivalent adherence to the physician-only care model for the epilepsy quality measures, with superior adherence to the counseling measures of querying for side effects, provision of personalized epilepsy safety education, and screening for behavioral health disorders. The 2 care models performed similarly in all clinical outcomes.

conclusionsAn NP-physician team care model employed to increase availability of care could also improve quality of care delivered.

Identifiers

PMID28409062
PMCPMC5386842
OpenAlexW2575087082

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.