ArticleUnited European gastroenterology journal2016
Real-world
Article in United European gastroenterology journal, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Double-site rapid urease test versus histopathology for the diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori among patients with dyspepsia on proton pump inhibitors-A diagnostic accuracy study.Indian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology · 2026Article
- Diagnostic Approach to Pediatric Collagenous Gastritis Based on a Case Series and Literature Review.Pediatric gastroenterology, hepatology & nutrition · 2026Article
- Knowledge, attitudes, and practices of adults in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia regardingJournal of medicine and life · 2024Article
- Systematic Retesting forBioMed research international · 2022Article
- Article
- Identification of antibiotic resistance patterns inAnnals of gastroenterologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
aimsHistopathology is the most accurate test to detect
methodsDetailed information about three known factors (PPIs, antibiotics and prior
resultsA total of 409 individuals at three academic gastroenterology institutions were tested 200 times with histology. Fifty-six per cent (68 of 122) of all negative tests fell in the category of continuing PPI use, which had the potential to make the histology and RUT results unreliable.
conclusionsThese data demonstrate a clear and important gap between current guidelines and real-world practice with regards to the diagnosis of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.