Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28408989›Full record

ArticleUnited European gastroenterology journal2016

Timing of oral refeeding in acute pancreatitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Masayasu Horibe, Toshihiro Nishizawa, Hidekazu Suzuki, Kazuhiro Minami, Naohisa Yahagi, Eisuke Iwasaki, Takanori Kanai

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in United European gastroenterology journal, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04168801 (Non-inferiority Comparative Clinical Trial Between Early Oral Refeeding Versus Usual Oral Refeeding in Mild Acute Pancreatitis Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04168801 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

Non-inferiority Comparative Clinical Trial Between Early Oral Refeeding Versus Usual Oral Refeeding in Mild Acute Pancreatitis Patients

TypeinterventionalSponsorHospital Regional de Alta Especialidad del BajioRan2018 to 2019Enrolled124ConditionsPancreatitisArmsearly oral refeeding
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Management of acute pancreatitis in the "no man's land".Internal and emergency medicine · 2025
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Nutrition in Pancreatic Diseases: A Roadmap for the Gastroenterologist.GE Portuguese journal of gastroenterology · 2024
    Review
  6. Nutrition in acute pancreatitis.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2023
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Nutrition therapy in acute and chronic pancreatitis.Medicine and pharmacy reports · 2021
    Article
  10. Nutrition and Acute Pancreatitis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Towards evidence-based and personalised care of acute pancreatitis.United European gastroenterology journal · 2020
    Review
  14. Review
  15. UEG Week 2019 Poster Presentations.United European gastroenterology journal · 2019
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Masayasu HoribeDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Keio University School of Medicine.
Toshihiro NishizawaDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Keio University School of Medicine.
Hidekazu SuzukiDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Keio University School of Medicine.
Kazuhiro MinamiDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Keio University School of Medicine.
Naohisa YahagiDivision of Research and Development for Minimally Invasive Treatment, Cancer Center, Keio University School Of Medicine.
Eisuke IwasakiDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Keio University School of Medicine.
Takanori KanaiDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Keio University School of Medicine.
Keio University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimThe optimal timing of oral refeeding in acute pancreatitis is unclear. This study aimed to perform a systematic review with meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared early oral refeeding with standard oral refeeding in acute pancreatitis.

methodsPubMed, the Cochrane library, and the Igaku-Chuo-Zasshi database were searched in order to identify RCTs eligible for inclusion in the systematic review. The weighted mean differences (WMDs) or odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated.

resultsFive eligible RCTs were included. Compared with standard oral refeeding, early oral refeeding significantly decreased the length of hospital stay (WMD: -2.22, 95%CI: -3.37 to -1.08,

conclusionsCompared with standard oral refeeding, early oral refeeding safely reduced the length of hospital stay in patients with acute pancreatitis.

Indexed as

acute pancreatitisEarly oral refeedingmeta-analysis randomized control trialnutritionsystematic review

Identifiers

PMID28408989
PMCPMC5386222
OpenAlexW2225728608

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.