Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28408779›Full record

ArticleCanadian journal of veterinary research = Revue canadienne de recherche veterinaire2017

Effect of the probiotic

Luis Delucchi, Martín Fraga, Pablo Zunino

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Canadian journal of veterinary research = Revue canadienne de recherche veterinaire, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Luis DelucchiDepartamento de Patología y Clínica de Pequeños Animales, Facultad de Veterinaria, Universidad de la República, Lasplaces 1550, CP 11600, Montevideo, Uruguay (Delucchi); Departamento de Microbiología, Instituto de Investigaciones Biológicas Clemente Estable, Avenida Italia 3318, CP 11600, Montevideo, Uruguay (Fraga, Zunino).
Martín FragaDepartamento de Patología y Clínica de Pequeños Animales, Facultad de Veterinaria, Universidad de la República, Lasplaces 1550, CP 11600, Montevideo, Uruguay (Delucchi); Departamento de Microbiología, Instituto de Investigaciones Biológicas Clemente Estable, Avenida Italia 3318, CP 11600, Montevideo, Uruguay (Fraga, Zunino).
Pablo ZuninoDepartamento de Patología y Clínica de Pequeños Animales, Facultad de Veterinaria, Universidad de la República, Lasplaces 1550, CP 11600, Montevideo, Uruguay (Delucchi); Departamento de Microbiología, Instituto de Investigaciones Biológicas Clemente Estable, Avenida Italia 3318, CP 11600, Montevideo, Uruguay (Fraga, Zunino).
Universidad de la República · UY

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objective of this study was to assess the effect of the probiotic

Indexed as

AnimalsDiarrheaDistemperDogsLactobacillusProbiotics

Identifiers

PMID28408779
PMCPMC5370537
OpenAlexW2996239188

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.