Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28408660›Full record

ArticleThe Plant cell2017

A Global Coexpression Network Approach for Connecting Genes to Specialized Metabolic Pathways in Plants.

Jennifer H Wisecaver, Alexander T Borowsky, Vered Tzin, Georg Jander, Daniel J Kliebenstein, Antonis Rokas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Plant cell, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 123 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
123citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

123 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Entry Steps in the Biosynthetic Pathway to Diterpenoid Alkaloids inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Evolution of plant metabolism: the state-of-the-art.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Review

63 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jennifer H WisecaverDepartment of Biological Sciences, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee 37235.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6843-5906
Alexander T BorowskyDepartment of Biological Sciences, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee 37235.
Vered TzinFrench Associates Institute for Agriculture and Biotechnology of Drylands, Jacob Blaustein Institute for Desert Research, Ben Gurion University, Sede-Boqer Campus 84990, Israel.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5912-779X
Georg JanderBoyce Thompson Institute for Plant Research, Tower Road, Ithaca, New York 14853.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9675-934X
Daniel J KliebensteinDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of California-Davis, Davis, California 95616.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5759-3175
Antonis RokasDepartment of Biological Sciences, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee 37235 antonis.rokas@vanderbilt.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7248-6551

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plants produce diverse specialized metabolites (SMs), but the genes responsible for their production and regulation remain largely unknown, hindering efforts to tap plant pharmacopeia. Given that genes comprising SM pathways exhibit environmentally dependent coregulation, we hypothesized that genes within a SM pathway would form tight associations (modules) with each other in coexpression networks, facilitating their identification. To evaluate this hypothesis, we used 10 global coexpression data sets, each a meta-analysis of hundreds to thousands of experiments, across eight plant species to identify hundreds of coexpressed gene modules per data set. In support of our hypothesis, 15.3 to 52.6% of modules contained two or more known SM biosynthetic genes, and module genes were enriched in SM functions. Moreover, modules recovered many experimentally validated SM pathways, including all six known to form biosynthetic gene clusters (BGCs). In contrast, bioinformatically predicted BGCs (i.e., those lacking an associated metabolite) were no more coexpressed than the null distribution for neighboring genes. These results suggest that most predicted plant BGCs are not genuine SM pathways and argue that BGCs are not a hallmark of plant specialized metabolism. We submit that global gene coexpression is a rich, largely untapped resource for discovering the genetic basis and architecture of plant natural products.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, PlantMetabolic Networks and PathwaysMultigene Family

Identifiers

PMID28408660
PMCPMC5466033

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.