Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28408620›Full record

ArticleThe oncologist2017

Oncofertility: Fertile Ground for Conflict Between Patient Autonomy and Medical Values.

Sarah K Walsh, Elizabeth S Ginsburg, Lisa Soleymani Lehmann, Ann H Partridge

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in The oncologist, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. 4th ESO-ESMO International Consensus Guidelines for Advanced Breast Cancer (ABC 4)†.Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology · 2018
    Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sarah K WalshDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Elizabeth S GinsburgDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Lisa Soleymani LehmannBrigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Ann H PartridgeDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA ahpartridge@partners.org.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Oncofertility is a unique, multidisciplinary field that serves to bridge the gap between available fertility resources and the special reproductive needs of cancer patients. Oncofertility is a growing field due to the increasing number of survivors, development of new oncologic therapies, extension of duration of therapies, and development and refinement of reproductive therapies. While the technologies and demand for services expand, clinicians need to be appropriately prepared for dealing with various clinical scenarios that may require ethical deliberation. Three real cases are presented in which the patient wishes to pursue reproductive assistance, but her decision is met with hesitance or uncertainty by her care team. Discussion of these clinical scenarios highlights ethical implications of oncofertility practice and serves to highlight the need for the establishment of multidisciplinary care teams and guidelines to support both clinicians and patients. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: The growing field of oncofertility is ripe for conflict between patient autonomy and medical values due to the nature of cancer and associated threat on an individual's health and survival, as well as the personal significance of childbearing. Cases are presented and ethical implications are discussed to further explore the inherent difficulties in oncofertility practice and guide clinicians in similar situations. Developing guidelines and establishing multidisciplinary teams to facilitate oncofertility discussions and care, as well as training of clinical team members, may improve patient safety, well-being, and satisfaction within the context of fertility decision making, care, and outcomes.

Indexed as

Personal AutonomyPregnancy Complications, NeoplasticAdultBreast NeoplasmsCryopreservationEmbryo TransferFemaleFertility PreservationHumansOocyte RetrievalOocytesPregnancyYoung AdultCancerChemotherapyDecision MakingEthicsEtiologyFemaleInfertilityPrevention and controlSurvivors

Identifiers

PMID28408620
PMCPMC5507640

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.