ArticleThe oncologist2017
Oncofertility: Fertile Ground for Conflict Between Patient Autonomy and Medical Values.
Article in The oncologist, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- 4th ESO-ESMO International Consensus Guidelines for Advanced Breast Cancer (ABC 4)†.Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology · 2018Guideline
- Decision-making and psychological outcomes in women with breast cancer: Insights into the choice against fertility preservation and implications for supportive care.PEC innovation · 2026Article
- Predictors of referral for fertility preservation counseling in patients diagnosed with cancer.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2026Article
- Ethics of non-oncological fertility preservation from the perspective of the four principles of bioethics.Frontiers in reproductive health · 2026Article
- Impact of immune checkpoint inhibitors on pregnancy: current evidence and future directions.BMJ oncology · 2026Review
- Ethical perspectives of fertility preservation through experts' opinions.Frontiers in reproductive health · 2026Article
- Metastatic malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor of the uterus and cervix: Diagnostic Challenges, prognostic determinants and treatment.Gynecologic oncology reports · 2024Article
- Shared Decision-Making About Future Fertility in Childhood Cancer Survivorship: Perspectives of Parents in Uganda.Journal of adolescent and young adult oncology · 2023Article
- Fertility-sparing surgery: a hopeful strategy for young women with cancer.Journal of medicine and life · 2023Review
- Oncofertility and COVID-19: At the Crossroads between Two Time-Sensitive Fields.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Oncofertility is a unique, multidisciplinary field that serves to bridge the gap between available fertility resources and the special reproductive needs of cancer patients. Oncofertility is a growing field due to the increasing number of survivors, development of new oncologic therapies, extension of duration of therapies, and development and refinement of reproductive therapies. While the technologies and demand for services expand, clinicians need to be appropriately prepared for dealing with various clinical scenarios that may require ethical deliberation. Three real cases are presented in which the patient wishes to pursue reproductive assistance, but her decision is met with hesitance or uncertainty by her care team. Discussion of these clinical scenarios highlights ethical implications of oncofertility practice and serves to highlight the need for the establishment of multidisciplinary care teams and guidelines to support both clinicians and patients. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: The growing field of oncofertility is ripe for conflict between patient autonomy and medical values due to the nature of cancer and associated threat on an individual's health and survival, as well as the personal significance of childbearing. Cases are presented and ethical implications are discussed to further explore the inherent difficulties in oncofertility practice and guide clinicians in similar situations. Developing guidelines and establishing multidisciplinary teams to facilitate oncofertility discussions and care, as well as training of clinical team members, may improve patient safety, well-being, and satisfaction within the context of fertility decision making, care, and outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.