Trial reportBMJ open2017
Cost and outcome of behavioural activation versus cognitive behavioural therapy for depression (COBRA): a qualitative process evaluation.
Trial report in BMJ open, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04768361 (Behavioral Activation for Major Depressive Disorder), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Behavioral Activation for Major Depressive Disorder: Comparison Between Protocols With and Without Mindfulness
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Behavioural activation therapy for depression in adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020Pooled it
- A qualitative study exploring depressed participants' experiences of receiving Augmented Depression Therapy (ADepT).BMJ open · 2025Trial
- Primary care patients' experiences of video consultations for depression and anxiety: a qualitative interview study embedded in a randomized feasibility trial.BMC health services research · 2023Trial
- Morita Therapy for depression (Morita Trial): an embedded qualitative study of acceptability.BMJ open · 2019Trial
- Positive self talk journaling intervention to improve psychological well-being among child and adolescents in juvenile.Child and adolescent psychiatry and mental health · 2025Article
- Patient experiences of behavioural therapy for bipolar depression: A qualitative study.The British journal of clinical psychology · 2025Article
- Efficacy of behavioural activation in the treatment of negative symptoms in people with schizophrenia spectrum disorders: A systematic review.International journal of nursing studies advances · 2023Review
- Exploratory graph analysis on the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC) among older adults in China.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Article
- The influence of internet use frequency, family atmosphere, and academic performance on adolescent depression: Based on the chain mediating effect of self-adjustment and campus deviant behavior.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Article
- Article
- Patients' and nurses' views on providing psychological support within cardiac rehabilitation programmes: a qualitative study.BMJ open · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo explore participant views on acceptability, mechanisms of change and impact of behavioural activation (BA) delivered by junior mental health workers (MHWs) versus cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) delivered by professional psychotherapists.
designSemistructured qualitative interviews analysed using a framework approach.
participants36 participants with major depressive disorder purposively sampled from a randomised controlled trial of BA versus CBT (the COBRA trial).
settingPrimary care psychological therapies services in Devon, Durham and Leeds, UK.
resultsElements of therapy considered to be beneficial included its length and regularity, the opportunity to learn and not dwelling on the past. Homework was an important, although challenging aspect of treatment. Therapists were perceived as experts who played an important role in treatment. For some participants the most important element of therapy was having someone to talk to, but for others the specific factors associated with BA and CBT were crucial, with behavioural change considered important for participants in both treatments, and cognitive change unsurprisingly discussed more by those receiving CBT. Both therapies were considered to have a positive impact on symptoms of depression and other areas of life including feelings about themselves, self-care, work and relationships. Barriers to therapy included work, family life and emotional challenges. A subset (n=2) of BA participants commented that therapy felt too simple, and MHWs could be perceived as inexperienced. Many participants saw therapy as a learning experience, providing them with tools to take away, with work on relapse prevention essential.
conclusionsDespite barriers for some participants, BA and CBT were perceived to have many benefits, to have brought about cognitive and behavioural change and to produce improvements in many domains of participants' lives. To optimise the delivery of BA, inexperienced junior MHWs should be supported through good quality training and ongoing supervision. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN27473954, 09/12/2011.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.