ArticleBMC psychiatry2017
Understanding experiences of and preferences for service user and carer involvement in physical health care discussions within mental health care planning.
Article in BMC psychiatry, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 49 citations in OpenAlex.
- Supported decision-making interventions in mental healthcare: A systematic review of current evidence and implementation barriers.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024Pooled it
- The Role of Family-Centred Approaches in Promoting Inclusive Mental Health Care for Individuals with Psychiatric Disorders: A Scoping Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026Article
- Breaking Barriers Transforming Primary Care to Serve the Physical Health Needs of Individuals With SMI in the NHS.International journal of mental health nursing · 2025Review
- The impact of providing care for physical health in severe mental illness on informal carers: a qualitative study.BMC psychiatry · 2024Article
- How is physical healthcare experienced by staff, service users, and carers in adult community mental health services in a south London mental health trust? A service evaluation.Frontiers in health services · 2023Article
- Mental health consumers' perspectives of physical health interventions: An integrative review.International journal of mental health nursing · 2022Review
- Article
- Attitudes to physical healthcare in severe mental illness; a patient and mental health clinician qualitative interview study.BMC family practice · 2020Article
- Healthcare Professionals' and Users' Experiences of Intersectoral Care between Hospital and Community Mental Healthcare.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020Article
- Implementing a collaborative model in health education practice: a process evaluation of a health education programme targeting users with mental health problems.BMC health services research · 2020Article
- Barriers and facilitators to the effective de-escalation of conflict behaviours in forensic high-secure settings: a qualitative study.International journal of mental health systems · 2020Article
- Impact of mental illness on care for somatic comorbidities in France: a nation-wide hospital-based observational study.Epidemiology and psychiatric sciences · 2019Observational
- Article
- Barriers and facilitators of effective health education targeting people with mental illness: a theory-based ethnographic study.BMC psychiatry · 2018Article
- Best practice framework for Patient and Public Involvement (PPI) in collaborative data analysis of qualitative mental health research: methodology development and refinement.BMC psychiatry · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPeople with severe mental illness suffer more physical comorbidity than the general population, which can require a tailored approach to physical health care discussions within mental health care planning. Although evidence pertaining to service user and carer involvement in mental health care planning is accumulating, current understanding of how physical health is prioritised within this framework is limited. Understanding stakeholder experiences of physical health discussions within mental health care planning, and the key domains that underpin this phenomena is essential to improve quality of care. Our study aimed to explore service user, carer and professional experiences of and preferences for service user and carer involvement in physical health discussions within mental health care planning, and develop a conceptual framework of effective user-led involvement in this aspect of service provision.
methodsSix focus groups and four telephone interviews were carried out with twelve service users, nine carers, three service users with a dual service user and carer role, and ten mental health professionals recruited from one mental health Trust in the United Kingdom. Data was analysed utilising a thematic approach, analysed separately for each stakeholder group, and combined to aid comparisons.
resultsNo service users or carers recalled being explicitly involved in physical health discussions within mental health care planning. Six prerequisites for effective service user and carer involvement in physical care planning were identified. Three themes confirmed general mental health care planning requirements: tailoring a collaborative working relationship, maintaining a trusting relationship with a professional, and having access to and being able to edit a living document. Three themes were novel to feeling involved in physical health care planning discussions: valuing physical health equally with mental health; experiencing coordination of care between physical-mental health professionals, and having a physical health discussion that is personalised.
conclusionsHigh quality physical health care discussions within the care planning process demands action at multiple levels. A conceptual framework is presented which provides an evidence-based foundation for service level improvement. Further work is necessary to develop a new patient reported outcome measure to enable meaningful quantification of health care quality and patient experience.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.