ArticleTobacco control2015
Standardised packaging and new enlarged graphic health warnings for tobacco products in Australia-legislative requirements and implementation of the
Article in Tobacco control, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
28 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluating US smokers' willingness to pay for different cigarette packaging designs before and after real-world exposure in a randomised trial.Tobacco control · 2023Trial
- Effects of cigarette package colors and warning labels on marlboro smokers' risk beliefs, product appraisals, and smoking behavior: a randomized trial.BMC public health · 2023Trial
- Influence of premium versus value brand names on the smoking experience in a plain packaging environment: an experimental study.BMJ open · 2017Trial
- Application of a revised model for coping with advanced cancer to qualitatively explore lung cancer survivors' experiences of ongoing physical effects, novel treatments, uncertainty, and coping.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2024Article
- Role of affective reactivity induced by cigarette packaging including graphic warning labels: the CASA Study.Tobacco control · 2023Article
- Emotional Impact of Graphic Health Warnings on Tobacco Packaging: Analysis of Their Content.Europe's journal of psychology · 2022Article
- Plain packaging on tobacco products in France: Effectiveness on smokers' attitudes one year after implementation.Tobacco induced diseases · 2022Article
- Changes in Australian community perceptions of non-communicable disease prevention: a greater role for government?BMC public health · 2021Article
- The impacts of including information about the number of carcinogens in smoke on standardized cigarette packs in the UK.European journal of public health · 2021Article
- Article
- Smoker perceptions of health warnings on cigarette packaging and cigarette sticks: A four-country study.Tobacco induced diseases · 2019Article
- Article
- The tobacco industry's challenges to standardised packaging: A comparative analysis of issue framing in public relations campaigns in four countries.Health policy (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2018Review
- Influence of premium vs masked cigarette brand names on the experienced taste of a cigarette after tobacco plain packaging in Australia: an experimental study.BMC public health · 2018Article
- Article
- Believability of Cigar Warning Labels Among Adolescents.The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine · 2017Article
- Re-analysing tobacco industry funded research on the effect of plain packaging on minors in Australia: Same data but different results.Tobacco prevention & cessation · 2017Article
- Rhetoric and the law, or the law of rhetoric: How countries oppose novel tobacco control measures at the World Trade Organization.Social science & medicine (1982) · 2016Article
- Using eye-tracking to examine how embedding risk corrective statements improves cigarette risk beliefs: Implications for tobacco regulatory policy.Drug and alcohol dependence · 2016Article
- Australian adult smokers' responses to plain packaging with larger graphic health warnings 1 year after implementation: results from a national cross-sectional tracking survey.Tobacco control · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This paper describes the development, content and implementation of two pieces of Australian tobacco control legislation: one to standardise the packaging of tobacco products and the other to introduce new, enlarged graphic health warnings. It describes the process of legislative drafting, public consultation and parliamentary consideration. It summarises exactly how tobacco products have been required to look since late 2012. Finally, it describes implementation, most particularly, the extent to which packs compliant with the legislation became available to consumers over time.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.