Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28407418›Full record

Trial reportJournal of veterinary internal medicine2017

Pharmacokinetics and Acid Suppressant Efficacy of Esomeprazole after Intravenous, Oral, and Subcutaneous Administration to Healthy Beagle Dogs.

J-H Hwang, J-W Jeong, G-H Song, T-S Koo, K-W Seo

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of veterinary internal medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Pharmacokinetics of esomeprazole in goats (Frontiers in veterinary science · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

J-H HwangCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Chungnam National University, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon, Korea.
J-W JeongGraduate School of New Drug Discovery and Development, Chungnam National University, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon, Korea.
G-H SongLaboratory of Veterinary Internal Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Chungnam National University, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon, Korea.
T-S KooGraduate School of New Drug Discovery and Development, Chungnam National University, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon, Korea.
K-W SeoCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Chungnam National University, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon, Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1561-3278
Chungnam National University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEsomeprazole is an S-enantiomer of omeprazole that has favorable pharmacokinetics and efficacious acid suppressant properties in humans. However, the pharmacokinetics and effects on intragastric pH of esomeprazole in dogs have not been reported.

objectiveTo determine the pharmacokinetics of esomeprazole administered via various routes (PK study) and to investigate the effect of esomeprazole on intragastric pH with a Bravo pH monitoring system (PD study). ANIMALS: Seven adult male Beagle dogs and 5 adult male Beagle dogs were used for PK and PD study, respectively.

methodsBoth studies used an open, randomized, and crossover design. In the PK study, 7 dogs received intravenous (IV), subcutaneous (SC), and oral doses (PO) of esomeprazole (1 mg/kg). Each treatment period was separated by a washout period of at least 10 days. Esomeprazole plasma concentrations were measured by HPLC/MS/MS. In the efficacy study, intragastric pH was recorded without medication (baseline pH) and following IV, SC, and PO esomeprazole dosing regimens (1 mg/kg) in 5 dogs.

resultsThe bioavailability of esomeprazole administered as PO enteric-coated granules and as SC injections was 71.4 and 106%, respectively. The half-life was approximately 1 hour. Mean ± SD percent time intragastric pH was ≥3 and ≥4 was 58.9 ± 21.1% and 40.9 ± 17.3% for IV group, 75.8 ± 16.4% and 62.7 ± 17.7% for SC group, 88.2 ± 8.9% and 82.5 ± 7.7% for PO group, and 12.5 ± 3.6% and 3.7 ± 1.8% for baseline. The mean percent time with intragastric pH was ≥3 or ≥4 was significantly increased regardless of the dosing route (P < .05).

conclusionThe PK parameters for PO and SC esomeprazole administration were favorable, and esomeprazole significantly increased intragastric pH after IV, PO, and SC administration. IV and SC administration of esomeprazole might be useful when PO administration is not possible. No significant adverse effects were observed.

Indexed as

Administration, OralAnimalsAnti-Ulcer AgentsArea Under CurveCross-Over StudiesDogsEsomeprazoleEsophagusFemaleHydrogen-Ion ConcentrationInjections, IntravenousInjections, SubcutaneousMaleReference ValuesAnti-Ulcer AgentsEsomeprazoleBravo pHIntragastric pHProton pump inhibitor

Identifiers

PMID28407418
PMCPMC5435062
OpenAlexW2606239059

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.