Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28407097›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2017

miRCat2: accurate prediction of plant and animal microRNAs from next-generation sequencing datasets.

Claudia Paicu, Irina Mohorianu, Matthew Stocks, Ping Xu, Aurore Coince, Martina Billmeier, Tamas Dalmay, Vincent Moulton, Simon Moxon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Interactive Web-based Annotation of Plant MicroRNAs with iwa-miRNA.Genomics, proteomics & bioinformatics · 2022
    Article
  6. The Multiverse of Plant Small RNAs: How Can We Explore It?International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Claudia PaicuThe Earlham Institute, Norwich Research Park, Norwich NR4 7UG, UK.
Irina MohorianuSchool of Computing Sciences.
Matthew StocksSchool of Computing Sciences.
Ping XuSchool of Biological Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich Research Park, Norwich NR4 7TJ, UK.
Aurore CoinceSchool of Biological Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich Research Park, Norwich NR4 7TJ, UK.
Martina BillmeierSchool of Biological Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich Research Park, Norwich NR4 7TJ, UK.
Tamas DalmaySchool of Biological Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich Research Park, Norwich NR4 7TJ, UK.
Vincent MoultonSchool of Computing Sciences.
Simon MoxonSchool of Biological Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich Research Park, Norwich NR4 7TJ, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationMicroRNAs are a class of ∼21-22 nt small RNAs which are excised from a stable hairpin-like secondary structure. They have important gene regulatory functions and are involved in many pathways including developmental timing, organogenesis and development in eukaryotes. There are several computational tools for miRNA detection from next-generation sequencing datasets. However, many of these tools suffer from high false positive and false negative rates. Here we present a novel miRNA prediction algorithm, miRCat2. miRCat2 incorporates a new entropy-based approach to detect miRNA loci, which is designed to cope with the high sequencing depth of current next-generation sequencing datasets. It has a user-friendly interface and produces graphical representations of the hairpin structure and plots depicting the alignment of sequences on the secondary structure.

resultsWe test miRCat2 on a number of animal and plant datasets and present a comparative analysis with miRCat, miRDeep2, miRPlant and miReap. We also use mutants in the miRNA biogenesis pathway to evaluate the predictions of these tools. Results indicate that miRCat2 has an improved accuracy compared with other methods tested. Moreover, miRCat2 predicts several new miRNAs that are differentially expressed in wild-type versus mutants in the miRNA biogenesis pathway. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: miRCat2 is part of the UEA small RNA Workbench and is freely available from http://srna-workbench.cmp.uea.ac.uk/. CONTACT: v.moulton@uea.ac.uk or s.moxon@uea.ac.uk. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Indexed as

Genetic LociSoftwareAlgorithmsAnimalsComputational BiologyEntropyHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingMicroRNAsPlantsSequence Analysis, DNASequence Analysis, RNAMicroRNAs

Identifiers

PMID28407097
PMCPMC5870699

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.