ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2018
Comparative analysis of de novo assemblers for variation discovery in personal genomes.
Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- GrassSV - hybrid method to detect structural variants in high throughput DNA-seq data.PLoS computational biology · 2026Article
- A survey of k-mer methods and applications in bioinformatics.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2024Review
- Impact and characterization of serial structural variations across humans and great apes.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Genomic variant benchmark: if you cannot measure it, you cannot improve it.Genome biology · 2023Review
- De Novo Structural Variations of Escherichia coli Detected by Nanopore Long-Read Sequencing.Genome biology and evolution · 2023Article
- Characteristics and potential functional effects of long insertions in Asian butternuts.BMC genomics · 2022Article
- From genome structure to function: insights into structural variation in microbiology.Current opinion in microbiology · 2022Review
- The third international hackathon for applying insights into large-scale genomic composition to use cases in a wide range of organisms.F1000Research · 2022Article
- Structural variant identification and characterization.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2020Article
- On Variant Discovery in Genomes of Fungal Plant Pathogens.Frontiers in microbiology · 2020Article
- Structural variant calling: the long and the short of it.Genome biology · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Current variant discovery approaches often rely on an initial read mapping to the reference sequence. Their effectiveness is limited by the presence of gaps, potential misassemblies, regions of duplicates with a high-sequence similarity and regions of high-sequence divergence in the reference. Also, mapping-based approaches are less sensitive to large INDELs and complex variations and provide little phase information in personal genomes. A few de novo assemblers have been developed to identify variants through direct variant calling from the assembly graph, micro-assembly and whole-genome assembly, but mainly for whole-genome sequencing (WGS) data. We developed SGVar, a de novo assembly workflow for haplotype-based variant discovery from whole-exome sequencing (WES) data. Using simulated human exome data, we compared SGVar with five variation-aware de novo assemblers and with BWA-MEM together with three haplotype- or local de novo assembly-based callers. SGVar outperforms the other assemblers in sensitivity and tolerance of sequencing errors. We recapitulated the findings on whole-genome and exome data from a Utah residents with Northern and Western European ancestry (CEU) trio, showing that SGVar had high sensitivity both in the highly divergent human leukocyte antigen (HLA) region and in non-HLA regions of chromosome 6. In particular, SGVar is robust to sequencing error, k-mer selection, divergence level and coverage depth. Unlike mapping-based approaches, SGVar is capable of resolving long-range phase and identifying large INDELs from WES, more prominently from WGS. We conclude that SGVar represents an ideal platform for WES-based variant discovery in highly divergent regions and across the whole genome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.