ArticlePloS one2017
Effect of hypoxia on the retina and superior colliculus of neonatal pigs.
Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Trial
- Bridging Hypoxia and Vision Loss: The Emerging Role of Connexins in Local and Systemic Eye Diseases.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Effect of Hypoxia on Adult Müller Glia Cultures.Biomedicines · 2025Article
- Optimization of an Ischemic Retinopathy Mouse Model and the Consequences of Hypoxia in a Time-Dependent Manner.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Review
- Pan-retinal ganglion cell markers in mice, rats, and rhesus macaques.Zoological research · 2023Article
- Immunohistochemical Characterisation of the Whale Retina.Frontiers in neuroanatomy · 2022Article
- An In Vitro Study to Investigate Biomechanical Responses of Peripheral Nerves in Hypoxic Neonatal Piglets.Journal of biomechanical engineering · 2021Article
- All-trans-retinoic acid generation is an antidotal clearance pathway for all-trans-retinal in the retina.Journal of Zhejiang University. Science. BArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo evaluate the effect of hypoxia on the neonatal pig retina and brain, we analysed the retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) and neurons in the superior colliculus, as well as the response of astrocytes in both these central nervous system (CNS) structures.
methodsNewborn pigs were exposed to 120 minutes of hypoxia, induced by decreasing the inspiratory oxygen fraction (FiO2: 10-15%), followed by a reoxygenation period of 240 minutes (FiO2: 21-35%). RGCs were quantified using Brn3a, a specific nuclear marker for these cells, and apoptosis was assessed through the appearance of active caspase-3. A morphometric analysis of the cytoskeleton of astrocytes (identified with GFAP) was performed in both the retina and superior colliculus.
resultsHypoxia produced no significant change in the RGCs, although, it did induce a 37.63% increase in the number of active caspase-3 positive cells in the superior colliculus. This increase was particularly evident in the superficial layers of the superior colliculus, where 56.93% of the cells were positive for active caspase-3. In addition, hypoxia induced changes in the morphology of the astrocytes in the superior colliculus but not in the retina.
conclusionsHypoxia in the neonatal pig does not affect the retina but it does affect more central structures in the brain, increasing the number of apoptotic cells in the superior colliculus and inducing changes in astrocyte morphology. This distinct sensibility to hypoxia may pave the way to design specific approaches to combat the effects of hypoxia in specific areas of the CNS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.