ArticlePloS one2017
Transcriptomic profiling of taproot growth and sucrose accumulation in sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) at different developmental stages.
Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.
- Combined transcriptome and metabolome analysis reveals nitrogen-responsive genes and metabolites in sugar beet (Frontiers in plant science · 2026Article
- Integrated transcriptomic and metabolomic analyses reveal the molecular mechanisms of sugar accumulation and yield trade-off in sugar beet.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Article
- Article
- Transcriptomic analysis of Chinese yam (Frontiers in nutrition · 2023Article
- Form and contour: breeding and genetics of organ shape from wild relatives to modern vegetable crops.Frontiers in plant science · 2023Review
- Article
- Set up from the beginning: The origin and early development of cassava storage roots.Plant, cell & environment · 2022Article
- Roles of Abscisic Acid and Gibberellins in Stem/Root Tuber Development.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Integration of Transcriptomic and Proteomic Profiles Reveals Multiple Levels of Genetic Regulation of Taproot Growth in Sugar Beet (Frontiers in plant science · 2022Article
- Brassinosteroids promote parenchyma cell and secondary xylem development in sugar beet (Plant direct · 2021Article
- Cold-Triggered Induction of ROS- and Raffinose Metabolism in Freezing-Sensitive Taproot Tissue of Sugar Beet.Frontiers in plant science · 2021Article
- Integrative transcriptomics reveals genotypic impact on sugar beet storability.Plant molecular biology · 2020Article
- Understanding salt tolerance mechanism using transcriptome profiling and de novo assembly of wild tomato Solanum chilense.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Early-stage sugar beet taproot development is characterized by three distinct physiological phases.Plant direct · 2020Article
- Gene Regulatory Network Guided Investigations and Engineering of Storage Root Development in Root Crops.Frontiers in plant science · 2020Review
- Genome-wide identification, characterization, and expression patterns of the BZR transcription factor family in sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.).BMC plant biology · 2019Article
- De novo transcriptome analysis of Tibetan medicinal plant Dysphania schraderiana.Genetics and molecular biologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.), taproot weight and sucrose content are the important determinants of yield and quality. However, high yield and low sucrose content are two tightly bound agronomic traits. The advances in next-generation sequencing technology and the publication of sugar beet genome have provided a method for the study of molecular mechanism underlying the regulation of these two agronomic traits. In this work, we performed comparative transcriptomic analyses in the high taproot yield cultivar SD13829 and the high sucrose content cultivar BS02 at five developmental stages. More than 50,000,000 pair-end clean reads for each library were generated. When taproot turned into the rapid growth stage at the growth stage of 82 days after emergence (DAE), eighteen enriched gene ontology (GO) terms, including cell wall, cytoskeleton, and enzyme linked receptor protein signaling pathway, occurred in both cultivars. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) of paired comparison in both cultivars were enriched in the cell wall GO term. For pathway enrichment analyses of DEGs that were respectively generated at 82 DAE compared to 59 DAE (the earlier developmental stage before taproot turning into the rapid growth stage), plant hormone signal transduction pathway was enriched. At 82 DAE, the rapid enlarging stage of taproot, several transcription factor family members were up-regulated in both cultivars. An antagonistic expression of brassinosteroid- and auxin-related genes was also detected. In SD13829, the growth strategy was relatively focused on cell enlargement promoted by brassinosteroid signaling, whereas in BS02, it was relatively focused on secondarily cambial cell division regulated by cytokinin, auxin and brassinosteroid signaling. Taken together, our data demonstrate that the weight and sucrose content of taproot rely on its growth strategy, which is controlled by brassinosteroid, auxin, cytokinin, and gibberellin.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.