Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28406921›Full record

Observational studyPloS one2017

Is the risk of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy the real reason for natalizumab discontinuation in patients with multiple sclerosis?

Julia Krämer, Jan-Gerd Tenberge, Ingo Kleiter, Wolfgang Gaissmaier, Tobias Ruck, Christoph Heesen, Sven G Meuth

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Natalizumab: safety and risk in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis.European journal of hospital pharmacy : science and practice · 2021
    Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Julia KrämerDepartment of Neurology, Clinic of Neurology and Institute of Translational Neurology, Westfälische Wilhelms University, Münster, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2219-5593
Jan-Gerd TenbergeDepartment of Neurology, Clinic of Neurology and Institute of Translational Neurology, Westfälische Wilhelms University, Münster, Germany.
Ingo KleiterDepartment of Neurology, St. Josef-Hospital, Ruhr-University-Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
Wolfgang GaissmaierDepartment of Psychology, University of Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany.
Tobias RuckDepartment of Neurology, Clinic of Neurology and Institute of Translational Neurology, Westfälische Wilhelms University, Münster, Germany.
Christoph HeesenDepartment of Neurology, Institute of Neuroimmunology and MS (INIMS), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Sven G MeuthDepartment of Neurology, Clinic of Neurology and Institute of Translational Neurology, Westfälische Wilhelms University, Münster, Germany.
University of Münster · DESt. Josef-Hospital · DEUniversität Hamburg · DEUniversity of Konstanz · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProgressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML) is one of the major risks of natalizumab therapy. Despite introduction of the currently employed PML risk stratification algorithm, the incidence of natalizumab-associated PML cases is not decreasing.

objectivesWe addressed the following questions: How do natalizumab-treated multiple sclerosis patients and their treating physicians assess and deal with PML risk? Is PML risk the real reason for natalizumab discontinuation?

methods699 natalizumab-treated multiple sclerosis patients and 99 physicians were included in this prospective observational study. Questionnaires were completed at 5 different time points. Patients were stratified into 5 subgroups according to the presence of PML risk factors (prior immunosuppression, anti-JCV antibody status, treatment duration). Patients with prior immunosuppression (n = 30, treated by n = 7 physicians) were excluded from analyses, because patient numbers were too small. Patients' anti-JCV antibody index was not considered because data recruitment ended in 2014. Using Bayesian network and regression analysis, we examined the relationship between different patient- and physician-related factors and patients' discontinuation of natalizumab.

resultsPatients of all subgroups and physicians assessed the PML risk as low. Overall patient adherence to natalizumab was high (87%). Only 13% of patients discontinued therapy. Natalizumab treatment cessation was associated with different patient- and physician-related factors (physicians' assessment of general PML risk, number of treated patients per year, natalizumab treatment duration, relapses during the course of study) upon which only physicians' judgment on treatment continuation, patients' perception of personal PML risk, and JCV seroconversion showed significant relationships.

conclusionAccording to the currently employed risk stratification algorithm, the objective PML risk probably doesn't play a dominant role in a patients' decision to continue or stop natalizumab treatment. The decision-making process is rather guided by subjective views and experiences of patients and treating neurologists. Treating physicians should consider this discrepancy in their advice to improve the risk-benefit-ratio for the individual patient.

Indexed as

AdultAgedFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansLeukoencephalopathy, Progressive MultifocalMaleMiddle AgedMultiple SclerosisNatalizumabRisk FactorsNatalizumab

Identifiers

PMID28406921
PMCPMC5391008
OpenAlexW2606567068

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.