ReviewClinical obstetrics and gynecology2017
New Developments in Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Oncology Surgery.
Review in Clinical obstetrics and gynecology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Comparison of Robotic-Assisted vs. Conventional Laparoscopy for Para-aortic Lymphadenectomy in Gynecological Malignancies: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Frontiers in surgery · 2022Pooled it
- Comparison of Minimally Invasive Versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer: An Updated Meta-Analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Pooled it
- Evaluation of surgical approach and adjuvant therapy in uterine sarcomas: an 11-year population-based study.BMC cancer · 2026Article
- Lights camera action: Randomized control trial evaluating the impact of a preoperative instructional video on patient satisfaction following minimally invasive gynecologic surgery.PEC innovation · 2026Article
- Two strategies to reduce costs of robotic-assisted surgery in benign gynaecological cases: a German model for intraoperative cost minimisation and counteracting the shortage of physicians.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- Surgical approach selection and perioperative-pathological characteristics in endometrial cancer: a retrospective observational study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Annual nationwide cost estimation and short-term outcomes after para-aortic lymph node dissection for gynecologic malignancies according to surgical approach (open, laparoscopic, and robotic).Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Article
- Robot-Assisted Surgery for Endometrial Cancer Using KangDuo versus Da Vinci Systems: A Retrospective Comparative Study.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2025Article
- Research Trends and Hotspots in Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery: A Bibliometric and Visualization Analysis.International journal of women's health · 2025Review
- Review
- Infectious Complications in Laparoscopic Gynecologic Oncology Surgery within an ERAS-Compliant Setting.Journal of personalized medicine · 2024Article
- Comparison of Surgical Outcomes of Robotic versus Conventional Laparoscopic Hysterectomy of Large Uterus with Gynecologic Benign Disease.Journal of personalized medicine · 2022Article
- Surgical and Patient Outcomes of Robotic Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Hysterectomy: A Systematic Review.Cureus · 2021Review
- Progress and trends in publication of oral and video presentations at the society of gynecologic oncology annual meeting from 2006 to 2016.Gynecologic oncology reports · 2021Article
- Effect of multimodal analgesia on gynecological cancer patients after radical resection.American journal of translational research · 2021Article
- Stage III uterine serous carcinoma: modern trends in multimodality treatment.Journal of gynecologic oncology · 2020Article
- Basic Laparoscopic Skills Training Is Equally Effective Using 2D Compared to 3D Visualization: A Randomized Controlled Trial.Journal of clinical medicine · 2020Article
- Novel Surgical Strategies in the Treatment of Gynecological Malignancies.Current treatment options in oncology · 2018Review
- Port-Site Metastasis in Gynecological Malignancies.JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic SurgeonsReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Minimally invasive surgery continues to transform the field of gynecologic oncology and has now become the standard of care for many early-stage malignancies. The proven benefits of minimally invasive surgery are driving the rapid introduction and dissemination of novel technologies and the increasing ability to perform even the most complex procedures less invasively. In this article, we will review the current literature on traditional multiport laparoscopy, robotic-assisted laparoscopy, laparoendoscopic single-site surgery as well as robotic-assisted laparoendoscopic single-site surgery, with a specific focus on their role in the treatment of gynecologic malignancies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.