Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28406752›Full record

Trial reportHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2017

Comparison of the immunogenicity and safety of the purified chick embryo cell rabies vaccine manufactured in India and Germany: A randomized, single blind, multicentre, phase IV clinical study.

Gadey Sampath, Angelika Banzhoff, Alaka Deshpande, Claudius Malerczyk, Ashwani Kumar Arora, Hoshang Vakil, Scott Preiss

Open access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IVComparative StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 55% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Gadey Sampatha Institute of Preventive Medicine, Anti-Rabies Clinic , Hyderabad , India.
Angelika Banzhoffb GSK Vaccines GmbH , Marburg , Germany.
Alaka Deshpandec Department of Medicine , Grant Medical College , Mumbai , India.
Claudius Malerczykb GSK Vaccines GmbH , Marburg , Germany.
Ashwani Kumar Arorad GSK Vaccines , Siena , Italy.
Hoshang Vakile GSK Vaccines , Mumbai , India.
Scott Preissf GSK Vaccines , Wavre , Belgium.
GlaxoSmithKline (Belgium) · BEGlaxoSmithKline (India) · INGrant Medical College and Sir Jamshedjee Jeejeebhoy Group of Hospitals · INToscana Life Sciences · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This phase IV, single blind study assessed the immunogenicity and safety of India-manufactured purified chick embryo cell rabies vaccine (PCECV), compared with a German-manufactured batch obtained by the same production process. A total of 340 participants enrolled at 2 study sites in India were randomized (1:1:1:1) in 4 groups to receive a 5-dose Essen regimen with either 1 of the 3 Indian batches (PCECV-I) or the German batch (PCECV-G), administered on Days (D) 0, 3, 7, 14 and 30. The lot-to-lot consistency of PCECV-I batches in terms of induced immune response at D14 was demonstrated. The immune response elicited by PCECV-I was shown to be non-inferior to that induced by PCECV-G, as the lower limit of the 95% confidence interval for the ratio (PCECV-I/PCECV-G) of rabies virus neutralising antibody (RVNA) geometric mean concentrations was higher than 0.5 at D14. At least 96% of participants developed adequate RVNA concentrations (≥ 0.5 IU/mL) by D14 and all achieved RVNA concentrations ≥ 0.5 IU/mL by D90. RVNA levels were comparable across all groups throughout the entire study. Solicited local and general symptoms had a similar incidence in all groups. Unsolicited adverse events (AEs) were reported by 11% of participants. Only 1 serious AE (leg fracture) was reported and was not related to vaccination. No deaths and no rabies cases were recorded during the 90 days of observation. The study showed that the 3 PCECV-I and the PCECV-G batches induced a similar immune response and had a comparable safety profile when administered according to a 5-dose schedule.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAnimalsAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralCell Culture TechniquesChick EmbryoChildDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsFemaleGermanyHumansImmunization ScheduleIncidenceIndiaAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralRabies Vaccinesimmunogenicitylot-to-lot consistencyPCEC vaccinerabiessafety

Identifiers

PMID28406752
PMCPMC5512782
OpenAlexW2606904034

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.