Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28406439›Full record

ReviewViruses2017

Protein-Coding Genes' Retrocopies and Their Functions.

Magdalena Regina Kubiak, Izabela Makałowska

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Viruses, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Alu Deletions inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  11. HSDatabase-a database of highly similar duplicate genes from plants, animals, and algae.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Cancer, Retrogenes, and Evolution.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Magdalena Regina KubiakDepartment of Integrative Genomics, Institute of Anthropology, Faculty of Biology, Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznan, 61-614 Poznan, Poland. magdalena.kubiak@amu.edu.pl.
Izabela MakałowskaDepartment of Integrative Genomics, Institute of Anthropology, Faculty of Biology, Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznan, 61-614 Poznan, Poland. izabel@amu.edu.pl.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transposable elements, often considered to be not important for survival, significantly contribute to the evolution of transcriptomes, promoters, and proteomes. Reverse transcriptase, encoded by some transposable elements, can be used in

Indexed as

DNA Transposable ElementsEvolution, MolecularRetroelementsGene ExpressionGene Expression RegulationHumansNeoplasmsProteinsRNA-Directed DNA PolymeraseRNA, MessengerDNA Transposable ElementsProteinsRetroelementsRNA-Directed DNA PolymeraseRNA, Messengergene duplicationgenome evolutionretrocopyretrogeneretrotranspositionretrotransposon

Identifiers

PMID28406439
PMCPMC5408686

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.