Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28406180›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2017

DNA methylation landscape of ocular tissue relative to matched peripheral blood.

Alex W Hewitt, Vania Januar, Alexandra Sexton-Oates, Jihoon E Joo, Maria Franchina, Jie Jin Wang, Helena Liang, Jamie E Craig, Richard Saffery

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Alex W HewittLions Eye Institute, University of Western Australia, Centre for Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Perth, Australia.
Vania JanuarCancer and Disease Epigenetics, Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Royal Children's Hospital, Australia.
Alexandra Sexton-OatesCancer and Disease Epigenetics, Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Royal Children's Hospital, Australia.
Jihoon E JooDepartment of Pathology, University of Melbourne, Australia.
Maria FranchinaLions Eye Institute, University of Western Australia, Centre for Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Perth, Australia.
Jie Jin WangCentre for Vision Research, Department of Ophthalmology and Westmead Millennium Institute, University of Sydney, Westmead, Australia.
Helena LiangCentre for Eye Research Australia, University of Melbourne, Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.
Jamie E CraigDepartment of Ophthalmology, Flinders University, Flinders Medical Centre, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Richard SafferyCancer and Disease Epigenetics, Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Royal Children's Hospital, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Epigenetic variation is implicated in a range of non-communicable diseases, including those of the eye. However, investigating the role of epigenetic variation in central tissues, such as eye or brain, remains problematic and peripheral tissues are often used as surrogates. In this study, matched human blood and eye tissue (n = 8) were obtained post-mortem and DNA methylation profiling performed on blood, neurosensory retina, retinal pigment epithelium (RPE)/choroid and optic nerve tissue using the Illumina Infinium HumanMethylation450 platform. Unsupervised clustering and principal components analysis revealed tissue of origin as the main driver of methylation variation. Despite this, there was a strong correlation of methylation profiles between tissues with >255,000 CpG sites found to have similar methylation levels. An additional ~16,000 show similarity across ocular tissues only. A small proportion of probes showing inter-individual variation in blood co-varied with eye tissues within individuals, however much of this variation may be genetically driven. An improved understanding of the epigenetic landscape of the eye will have important implications for understanding eye disease. Despite a generally high correlation irrespective of origin, tissue type is the major driver of methylation variation, with only limited covariation between blood and any specific ocular tissue.

Indexed as

DNA MethylationEpigenesis, GeneticAdultAgedAnalysis of VarianceComputational BiologyCpG IslandsEyeGene OntologyGenomicsHumansMaleMiddle AgedMolecular Sequence Annotation

Identifiers

PMID28406180
PMCPMC5390318

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.