Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28406040›Full record

ArticleJournal of diabetes science and technology2017

Seven-Year Surveillance of the Clinical Performance of a Blood Glucose Test Strip Product.

Steven Setford, Mike Grady, Stuart Phillips, Lesley Miller, Stephen Mackintosh, Hilary Cameron, Krisna Corrigall

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of diabetes science and technology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. 10/10 Accuracy Analysis of a Self-Monitoring Blood Glucose System.Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2021
    Article
  7. Acute Stroke Biomarkers: Are We There Yet?Frontiers in neurology · 2021
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Steven Setford1 LifeScan Scotland Ltd, Inverness, UK.
Mike Grady1 LifeScan Scotland Ltd, Inverness, UK.
Stuart Phillips1 LifeScan Scotland Ltd, Inverness, UK.
Lesley Miller2 LifeScan Inc, Wayne, PA, USA.
Stephen Mackintosh1 LifeScan Scotland Ltd, Inverness, UK.
Hilary Cameron1 LifeScan Scotland Ltd, Inverness, UK.
Krisna Corrigall1 LifeScan Scotland Ltd, Inverness, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA key approach in enabling people with diabetes to better manage their condition is through self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG). Any functional SMBG system should demonstrate clinical accuracy across a broad glucose range and be insensitive to hematocrit. Furthermore, it should be incumbent on the manufacturer to demonstrate that their product continues to meet clinical accuracy claims during product lifetime.

methodsTest strips from a globally distributed SMBG product were sampled from randomly selected production batches as part of the manufacturer's routine product evaluation process. Clinical accuracy was assessed within diabetes patients at 3 clinic sites against a standard reference method and evaluated against system accuracy in accordance with the ISO 15197:2015 standard (unchanged from ISO 15197:2013 in terms of performance specifications). Data were collected over 7 years (2010-2016) and comprised 73,600 individual glucose results. Overall clinic performance was assessed, as was accuracy at low and high glucose levels and extremes of hematocrit.

resultsAcross the 7-year surveillance period, overall test strip clinical accuracy was 97.8% versus the 95% ISO-defined minimum criterion with by-year values of 97.0-98.6%. Accuracy at the lowest (≤50 mg/dL) and highest (>400 mg/dL) ranges of glucose was 97.0% and 98.3% respectively. Within these low/high blood glucose subpopulations, accuracy at the lower and upper first percentile hematocrit ranges, was 98.9%, and 97.1% respectively.

conclusionsThis 7-year surveillance program showed the test strips to have excellent clinical accuracy at the outer ranges of subject blood glucose and hematocrit, based on assessment against the ISO 15197:2015 clinical accuracy criterion.

Indexed as

Reagent StripsBiomarkersBlood GlucoseBlood Glucose Self-MonitoringDiabetes MellitusHematocritHumansPredictive Value of TestsProduct Surveillance, PostmarketingReproducibility of ResultsTime FactorsUnited KingdomBiomarkersBlood GlucoseReagent Stripsaccuracyclinicextremeglucosehematocritsurveillance

Identifiers

PMID28406040
PMCPMC5951036

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.