ArticleJournal of diabetes science and technology2017
Seven-Year Surveillance of the Clinical Performance of a Blood Glucose Test Strip Product.
Article in Journal of diabetes science and technology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical Accuracy of a Glucose Oxidase-Based Blood Glucose Test-Strip Across Extremes of Oxygen Partial Pressure.Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2024Article
- Distribution of Oxygen Partial Pressures in Native Capillary Fingertip Blood Samples From a Large Diabetes Patient Population.Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2023Article
- Updated Post-Market Surveillance of the Clinical Accuracy of a Blood Glucose Test Strip Platform.Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2023Article
- Post-Market Surveillance Assessment of the Clinical Accuracy of a Blood Glucose Monitoring System with an Improved Algorithm for Enhanced Product Performance.Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2023Article
- Commercial and Scientific Solutions for Blood Glucose Monitoring-A Review.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- 10/10 Accuracy Analysis of a Self-Monitoring Blood Glucose System.Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2021Article
- Acute Stroke Biomarkers: Are We There Yet?Frontiers in neurology · 2021Review
- Evidence From a Long-Term, Systematic Post-Market Surveillance Program: Clinical Performance of a Hematocrit-Insensitive Blood Glucose Test Strip.Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2021Article
- Analysis of a Unique Postmarket Surveillance Dataset That a Glucose Test-Strip Demonstrates no Evidence of Interference and Robust Clinical Accuracy Irrespective of the Prescription Medication Status of a Large Cohort of Patients With Diabetes.Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2021Article
- Measures of Accuracy for Continuous Glucose Monitoring and Blood Glucose Monitoring Devices.Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2019Review
- Seven-Year Clinical Surveillance Program Demonstrates Consistent MARD Accuracy Performance of a Blood Glucose Test Strip.Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2018Article
- Analysis of "Seven Year Surveillance of the Clinical Performance of a Blood Glucose Test-Strip Product".Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundA key approach in enabling people with diabetes to better manage their condition is through self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG). Any functional SMBG system should demonstrate clinical accuracy across a broad glucose range and be insensitive to hematocrit. Furthermore, it should be incumbent on the manufacturer to demonstrate that their product continues to meet clinical accuracy claims during product lifetime.
methodsTest strips from a globally distributed SMBG product were sampled from randomly selected production batches as part of the manufacturer's routine product evaluation process. Clinical accuracy was assessed within diabetes patients at 3 clinic sites against a standard reference method and evaluated against system accuracy in accordance with the ISO 15197:2015 standard (unchanged from ISO 15197:2013 in terms of performance specifications). Data were collected over 7 years (2010-2016) and comprised 73,600 individual glucose results. Overall clinic performance was assessed, as was accuracy at low and high glucose levels and extremes of hematocrit.
resultsAcross the 7-year surveillance period, overall test strip clinical accuracy was 97.8% versus the 95% ISO-defined minimum criterion with by-year values of 97.0-98.6%. Accuracy at the lowest (≤50 mg/dL) and highest (>400 mg/dL) ranges of glucose was 97.0% and 98.3% respectively. Within these low/high blood glucose subpopulations, accuracy at the lower and upper first percentile hematocrit ranges, was 98.9%, and 97.1% respectively.
conclusionsThis 7-year surveillance program showed the test strips to have excellent clinical accuracy at the outer ranges of subject blood glucose and hematocrit, based on assessment against the ISO 15197:2015 clinical accuracy criterion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.