Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28406034›Full record

ArticleJournal of diabetes science and technology2017

Analysis of "A New Optimized Percutaneous Access System for CIPII".

Eric Renard

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComment
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of diabetes science and technology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Eric Renard1 Montpellier University Hospital, Department of Endocrinology, Diabetes, Nutrition, Montpellier, France.
Université de Montpellier · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While only used initially in cases with resistance to subcutaneous insulin therapy, intraperitoneal insulin therapy provides an overall more stable glucose control than subcutaneous insulin therapy thanks to its pharmacokinetics as pointed by Garcia-Verdugo et al from the experience of implantable insulin pumps. The expansion of these devices has been limited by underdelivery issues and high cost. The availability of a new percutaneous access to intraperitoneal route could allow a similar glucose control with less constraints of follow-up and expected lower cost. Currently reported clinical experience does not allow a reliable assessment of its main risk of infection which could impair its sustained usability. Because intraperitoneal insulin could allow a fully automated closed-loop insulin delivery, a specific interest for its means of performance is relevant.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1Insulin Infusion SystemsBlood GlucoseHumansInfusion Pumps, ImplantableInsulinBlood GlucoseInsulindevicesimplantableinsulin deliveryintraperitoneal

Identifiers

PMID28406034
PMCPMC5588843
OpenAlexW2606582796

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.