Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28405954›Full record

ReviewCurrent neurology and neuroscience reports2017

Genetic Testing in Pediatric Epilepsy.

Tristan T Sands, Hyunmi Choi

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current neurology and neuroscience reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Journal of neurophysiology · 2022
    Article
  4. The Quality of Life of Children with Epilepsy and the Impact of the Disease on the Family Functioning.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Whole-Exome Sequencing Identifies NovelFrontiers in pediatrics · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Cardiac and neuronal HCN channelopathies.Pflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology · 2020
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Mutation in an alternative transcript ofCold Spring Harbor molecular case studies · 2018
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tristan T SandsDivision of Child Neurology, Columbia University Medical Center, 180 Fort Washington Avenue, New York, NY, 10032, USA. tristan.sands@columbia.edu.
Hyunmi ChoiDivision of Child Neurology, Columbia University Medical Center, 180 Fort Washington Avenue, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
Columbia University Irving Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThis article summarizes the emerging landscape of pediatric epilepsy, highlighting genetic contributions, and reviews approaches to genetic evaluation for pediatric epilepsy in this context. RECENT

findingsAdvances in understanding the genetic basis for epilepsy over the last several years have been due in large part to the identification of de novo genetic variation underlying sporadic severe epilepsy in children; the genetic underpinnings of the more common epilepsies remain largely unknown. Next-generation sequencing approaches have been added to the repertoire of clinical tests for the evaluation of pediatric epilepsy, improving our ability to make positive diagnoses. Yields of over 50% are now being reported in selected groups of patients. Genetic variation contributing to the risk for pediatric epilepsy spans continua of scale and influence. The highest yield of genetic testing is currently in children with sporadic severe epilepsy caused by de novo variation. The approach to genetic evaluation and interpretation of results requires an understanding of (1) the epilepsy phenotype and (2) the particular advantages and limitations of the different genetic tests available. Our understanding of genetic variation will continue to improve over time and "negative" results are best conceptualized as "unresolved" or "negative for now."

Indexed as

ChildEpilepsyGenetic TestingHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansPediatricsPhenotypeGenetic epilepsyGenetic testingPediatricWhole exome sequencing

Identifiers

PMID28405954
OpenAlexW2606201879

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.