ArticleImmunologic research2017
Effector functions of memory CTLs can be affected by signals received during reactivation.
Article in Immunologic research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Synergistic Activation of Bovine CD4+ T Cells by Neutrophils and IL-12.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- 5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine (DAC) treatment induces the MAGE-A10 expression and improves the cytotoxicity of MAGE-A10-specific CTLs in lung cancer cells.Translational cancer research · 2020Article
- CTL-Derived Exosomes Enhance the Activation of CTLs Stimulated by Low-Affinity Peptides.Frontiers in immunology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Memory cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs) are able to provide protections to the host against repeated insults from intracellular pathogens. However, it has not been completely understood how the effector functions of memory CTLs are induced upon antigen challenge, which is directly related to the efficacy of their protection. Third signal cytokines, such as IL-12 and type I interferon, have been suggested to be involved in the protective function of memory CTLs, but direct evidence is warranted. In this report, we found that memory CTLs need to be reactivated to exert effector functions. Infusion of a large population of quiescent memory CTLs did not lead to cancer control in tumor-bearing mice, whereas infusion of a reactivated memory CTL population did. This reactivation of memory CTLs requires cytokines such as IL-12 in addition to antigen but was less dependent upon costimulation and IL-2 compared to naive CTLs. Memory CTLs responded more quickly and with greater strength than their naive counterparts upon stimulation, which is associated with higher upregulation of important transcription factors such as T-bet and phosphorylated STAT4. In addition, memory CTLs underwent less expansion than naive CTLs upon pathogen challenge. In conclusion, effector functions of established memory CTLs may be affected by certain cytokines such as IL-12 and type I IFN. Thus, a pathogen's ability to induce cytokines could contribute to the efficacy of protection of an established memory CTL population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.