Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28405898›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education2018

Current Smokers' Preferences for Receiving Cessation Information in a Lung Cancer Screening Setting.

Lisa Carter-Harris, Rhonda Schwindt, Giorgos Bakoyannis, DuyKhanh Pham Ceppa, Susan M Rawl

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Attitudes towards the integration of smoking cessation into lung cancer screening in the United Kingdom: A qualitative study of individuals eligible to attend.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Lisa Carter-HarrisIndiana University School of Nursing, 600 Barnhill Drive, NU W427, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA. lcharris@iu.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-6448-6033
Rhonda SchwindtGeorge Washington University School of Nursing, Washington, DC, USA.
Giorgos BakoyannisDepartment of Biostatistics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
DuyKhanh Pham CeppaDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Susan M RawlIndiana University School of Nursing, 600 Barnhill Drive, NU W427, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA.

Funding

INDIANA UNIVERSITY: TRAINING IN BEHAVIORAL NURSINGT32NR007066 · NINR · INDIANA UNIV-PURDUE UNIV AT INDIANAPOLIS · PI RAWL, SUSAN M · 1990 to 2017
$4.2M
NINR NIH HHS T32 NR007066
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to identify current smokers' communication format preferences for receiving smoking cessation information in a lung cancer screening setting. A cross-sectional correlational design using survey methodology with 159 screening-eligible current smokers was the method used. Data was dichotomized (digital versus traditional preference) and analyzed using Pearson's chi-squared test, Mann-Whitney U test, and logistic regression. Race was a statistically significant predictor with White participants having four times greater odds of reporting preference for a digital format for receiving smoking cessation information such as social media and/or supportive text messages (OR: 4.06; p = 0.004). Lung cancer screening is a new venue where current long-term smokers can be offered information about smoking cessation while they are engaging in a health-promoting behavior and potentially more likely to contemplate quitting. It is important to consider the communication format preference of current smokers to support cessation uptake. This study is the first to examine communication format preference of current smokers in the context of the lung cancer screening venue. Key differences noted by race support the need for further research examining multiple formats of communication with efforts to maximize options in the cancer screening setting.

Indexed as

AgedCross-Sectional StudiesEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHealth BehaviorHumansLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedPatient Acceptance of Health CarePatient PreferenceSmokersSmokingSmoking CessationHealth communicationLung cancer screeningSmoking cessation

Identifiers

PMID28405898
PMCPMC5638665

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.