Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28405809›Full record

ArticleInternational orthopaedics2017

Measurement considerations on examiner-dependent factors in the ultrasound assessment of developmental dysplasia of the hip.

Alexander Kolb, Emir Benca, Madeleine Willegger, Stephan E Puchner, Reinhard Windhager, Catharina Chiari

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International orthopaedics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Alexander KolbDepartment of Orthopaedics and Orthopaedic Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria. alexander.kolb@meduniwien.ac.at.ORCID 0000-0001-7869-2586
Emir BencaDepartment of Orthopaedics and Orthopaedic Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Madeleine WilleggerDepartment of Orthopaedics and Orthopaedic Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Stephan E PuchnerDepartment of Orthopaedics and Orthopaedic Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Reinhard WindhagerDepartment of Orthopaedics and Orthopaedic Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Catharina ChiariDepartment of Orthopaedics and Orthopaedic Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe standardized sonographic hip screening according to Graf has increased reliability and comparability of measurements in the screening of developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH). However, examiner dependent factors have been discussed to influence sonographic measurements. The objectives of this study were to examine the tolerance of the transducer positioning and to analyse the impact of transducer inclinations on Graf's hip grading system. MATERIALS AND

methodsTwenty-four hips in consecutive newborns were screened sonographically in combination with an optoelectronic motion capture system to trace transducer positions in space. Subsequently five defined inclinations of the transducer relative to Graf's neutral transducer position were analysed, giving a total of 144 sonographic images.

resultsWe found a permissible transducer inclination in the axial plane of 8.8° to anterior and 8.1° to posterior. In the frontal plane we found a permissible inclination of 15.4° to caudal and 7.2° to cranial. The impact on the α-angle was significant for posterior-cranial (p < 0.001), cranial (p = 0.009), and caudal (p < 0.001) inclined transducer positions. The effect on the results according to Graf's grading system was significant for the caudal inclination of the transducer position (p < 0.001).

conclusionOur findings show that the standardized plane defined by Graf's criteria allows notable inclinations of the transducer positions. Transducer inclinations show an impact on measurement results, which are clinically relevant. Those effects cannot be ruled out using Graf's ultrasound criteria alone. The examiner should pay attention to avoid transducer inclinations in the frontal plane and a combination of posterior and cranial inclination.

Indexed as

FemaleHip Dislocation, CongenitalHip JointHumansInfant, NewbornMaleReproducibility of ResultsTransducersUltrasonographyDevelopmental Dysplasia of the Hip (DDH)Hip sonography

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.