Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28405762›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of urology2017

Histopathological correlations to ureteral lesions visualized during ureteroscopy.

Søren Kissow Lildal, Flemming Brandt Sørensen, Kim Hovgaard Andreassen, Frederikke Eichner Christiansen, Helene Jung, Malene Roland Pedersen, Palle Jörn Sloth Osther

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of urology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Effective ureteral access sheath insertion during flexible ureteroscopy: Influence of the ureteral orifice configuration.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Søren Kissow LildalDepartment of Urology, Urological Research Centre, Lillebaelt Hospital, Kabbeltoft 25, 7100, Vejle, Denmark.
Flemming Brandt SørensenDepartment of Clinical Pathology, Lillebaelt Hospital, Vejle, Denmark.
Kim Hovgaard AndreassenDepartment of Urology, Urological Research Centre, Lillebaelt Hospital, Kabbeltoft 25, 7100, Vejle, Denmark.
Frederikke Eichner ChristiansenDepartment of Urology, Urological Research Centre, Lillebaelt Hospital, Kabbeltoft 25, 7100, Vejle, Denmark.
Helene JungDepartment of Urology, Urological Research Centre, Lillebaelt Hospital, Kabbeltoft 25, 7100, Vejle, Denmark.
Malene Roland PedersenDepartment of Urology, Urological Research Centre, Lillebaelt Hospital, Kabbeltoft 25, 7100, Vejle, Denmark.
Palle Jörn Sloth OstherDepartment of Urology, Urological Research Centre, Lillebaelt Hospital, Kabbeltoft 25, 7100, Vejle, Denmark. palle.joern.osther@rsyd.dk.
University of Southern Denmark · DKLillebaelt Hospital · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo correlate ureteral lesions visualized during ureteroscopy with histopathological findings. MATERIALS AND

methodsUreteral access sheaths (UAS) sized 13/15 Fr. were inserted bilaterally in 22 laboratory pigs. During retraction of the UAS with a semirigid ureteroscope inside, ureteral lesions were evaluated and registered using the Post-ureteroscopic lesion scale (PULS). Ureters were excised in vivo between the uretero-pelvic junction and the uretero-vesical junction. Embedded in paraffin, 4-µm thick sections were step sectioned at 250-300 µm intervals and haematoxylin and eosin (HE) stained. Histopathological scoring of ureteral wall lesions was subsequently performed according to PULS.

resultsIn 72.1% of ureters, the highest histopathological score was at least 1 grade higher than the highest endoscopic PULS score. For 12 (27.9%) lesions, the difference was 2 scores higher, and for 1 (2.3%), it was 3 scores higher. The histopathological PULS grade was higher than the endoscopical PULS grade at all minimum, quartile, and maximum scores. There was a significant difference in the distribution of highest lesional scores between the endoscopic and histopathological PULS (p = 0.002). The calculated mean of the highest scores was 1.49 for endoscopic PULS and 2.51 for histopathological PULS (p < 0.0001).

conclusionHistopathological evaluation of ureteral wall lesions after UAS placement revealed a significantly higher degree of severity than observed endoscopically. Thus, endoscopy underestimated the histopathological extent of the lesion in the majority of cases.

Indexed as

UreterUreteroscopyAnimalsDimensional Measurement AccuracyResearch DesignSeverity of Illness IndexSwineUreteral DiseasesUreteroscopesComplicationsHistopathologyPost-ureteroscopic lesion scaleUreteral access sheathUreteral lesionsUreteroscopy

Identifiers

PMID28405762
PMCPMC5613101
OpenAlexW2605620482

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.