ArticleWorld journal of urology2017
Histopathological correlations to ureteral lesions visualized during ureteroscopy.
Article in World journal of urology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Incidence and context-specific risk patterns of ureteral avulsion and perforation during ureteroscopy: EAU endourology systematic review and meta-analysis.Urolithiasis · 2026Pooled it
- Effect of bladder emptying status on the ureteral access sheath insertion resistance and following ureteral injury in RIRS: a prospective randomized controlled trial in academic hospital.World journal of urology · 2023Trial
- Quantification of outflow resistance for ureteral drainage devices used during ureteroscopy.World journal of urology · 2023Article
- Effective ureteral access sheath insertion during flexible ureteroscopy: Influence of the ureteral orifice configuration.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2022Article
- Efficiency of retrograde intrarenal surgery in lower pole stones: disposable flexible ureterorenoscope or reusable flexible ureterorenoscope?World journal of urology · 2021Article
- Controversies associated with ureteral access sheath placement during ureteroscopy.Investigative and clinical urology · 2020Review
- Consultation on UTUC, Stockholm 2018 aspects of diagnosis of upper tract urothelial carcinoma.World journal of urology · 2019Review
- [Interrater reliability and clinical impact of the Post-Ureteroscopic Lesion Scale (PULS) grading system for ureteral lesions after ureteroscopy : Results of the German prospective multicenter BUSTER project].Der Urologe. Ausg. A · 2018Article
- Risks of flexible ureterorenoscopy: pathophysiology and prevention.Urolithiasis · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo correlate ureteral lesions visualized during ureteroscopy with histopathological findings. MATERIALS AND
methodsUreteral access sheaths (UAS) sized 13/15 Fr. were inserted bilaterally in 22 laboratory pigs. During retraction of the UAS with a semirigid ureteroscope inside, ureteral lesions were evaluated and registered using the Post-ureteroscopic lesion scale (PULS). Ureters were excised in vivo between the uretero-pelvic junction and the uretero-vesical junction. Embedded in paraffin, 4-µm thick sections were step sectioned at 250-300 µm intervals and haematoxylin and eosin (HE) stained. Histopathological scoring of ureteral wall lesions was subsequently performed according to PULS.
resultsIn 72.1% of ureters, the highest histopathological score was at least 1 grade higher than the highest endoscopic PULS score. For 12 (27.9%) lesions, the difference was 2 scores higher, and for 1 (2.3%), it was 3 scores higher. The histopathological PULS grade was higher than the endoscopical PULS grade at all minimum, quartile, and maximum scores. There was a significant difference in the distribution of highest lesional scores between the endoscopic and histopathological PULS (p = 0.002). The calculated mean of the highest scores was 1.49 for endoscopic PULS and 2.51 for histopathological PULS (p < 0.0001).
conclusionHistopathological evaluation of ureteral wall lesions after UAS placement revealed a significantly higher degree of severity than observed endoscopically. Thus, endoscopy underestimated the histopathological extent of the lesion in the majority of cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.