ReviewMedizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin2017
[Customised early mobilisation : How about a little bit more?]
Review in Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- [Interprofessional curriculum for early mobilization : Developed by the nursing section of the DGIIN in close cooperation with the German early mobilization network].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2023Review
- [Lactate changes during mobilization of intensive care patients : A retrospective observational study].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2022Review
- Assessment of mobilization capacity in 10 different ICU scenarios by different professions.PloS one · 2020Article
- [Reimbursement of intensive care services in Austria : Use of the LKF system].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Early mobilisation of patients in intensive care starts in a multiprofessional team with passive techniques continuing with assistive measures and finally going on to active training including mobilisation leading to sitting and standing positions as well as walking. Positive effects regarding these procedures have been proved in numerous studies and can also be found in the revision of the S2e guideline "Positioning and early mobilisation in prophylaxis or therapy of pulmonary disorders". In order to work with regard to the resources of the patient in intensive care, of the multiprofessional team, of the ward-specific structures and of the used equipment it is vital to apply a customised mobilisation concept. Consequently, intensive care medicine is personalised which means that the patient's needs are determined and precisely met. This and the patient's present physical capacity lead to the adaptation of nursing and therapeutic measures respectively. Some treatment methods and principles of training theory can be applied to the intensive care patient if beforehand the patient's current condition is evaluated by means of specific assessment methods. As a result, appropriate forms of therapy and adequate stimuli of training can be derived. The aim is a continuous process of early mobilisation with the best possible outcome guaranteed by a closed system of evaluation and re-evaluation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.