Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28405459›Full record

ArticlePorcine health management2017

Field efficacy of Porcilis® PCV M Hyo versus a licensed commercially available vaccine and placebo in the prevention of PRDC in pigs on a French farm: a randomized controlled trial.

Eric Pagot, Martial Rigaut, David Roudaut, Luca Panzavolta, Rika Jolie, Didier Duivon

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Porcine health management, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 45% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Comparative Safety and Efficacy of Commercial Porcine Vaccines AgainstAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Efficacy of Two Commercial Ready-To-Use PCV2 andAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021
    Article
  9. Field evaluation of a ready-to-use combinedPorcine health management · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Eric PagotZoopole Développement-CTPA, Ploufragan, France.
Martial RigautMSD Santé Animale, 7, rue Olivier de Serres - Angers Technopole C.S. 17144, 49071 Beaucouzé cedex, France.
David RoudautMSD Santé Animale, 7, rue Olivier de Serres - Angers Technopole C.S. 17144, 49071 Beaucouzé cedex, France.
Luca PanzavoltaMSD Santé Animale, 7, rue Olivier de Serres - Angers Technopole C.S. 17144, 49071 Beaucouzé cedex, France.
Rika JolieMSD Animal Health, 2 Giralda Farms, Madison, NJ 07940 USA.
Didier DuivonMSD Santé Animale, 7, rue Olivier de Serres - Angers Technopole C.S. 17144, 49071 Beaucouzé cedex, France.
Département Santé Animale · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA controlled, randomised, and blinded trial performed on a conventional French farrow-to-finish farm compared the efficacy of a one-shot bivalent ready to use vaccine, Porcilis® PCV M. Hyo (group PCVM), to that of two commercial vaccines (Ingelvac® Circoflex® + Ingelvac® Mhyo, group ICIM), and to a placebo (group CTL), in preventing the health and economic impacts of Porcine Respiratory Disease Complex (PRDC). MATERIAL &

methodsIn this small-scale clinical study, all piglets in each group were administered the vaccine/placebo at weaning age (27 days old). Piglets from either of the three groups were bled at regular intervals from 3 weeks of age until slaughter, in order to assess the infection by the main PRDC infectious agents:

resultsPCV2 viremia was significantly reduced in both vaccinated groups as compared to the placebo group. Lung lesion score was significantly lower in group PCVM, as compared to groups CTL and ICIM. Average daily weight gain during the finishing period was not significantly different between both vaccinated groups and was significantly higher than in the placebo group (849 g/d in the latter). Carcass results provided a numerical advantage to PCVM group, through improved part of production eligible for premium payment, and superior farmer income; this was a trend and did not reach significance.

conclusionThe one-shot bivalent vaccine Porcilis® PCV M Hyo proved to be efficacious and convenient to use in a field context of active PCV2 and

Indexed as

Mycoplasma hyopneumoniaePCV2Randomised controlled field trialVaccine

Identifiers

PMID28405459
PMCPMC5382521
OpenAlexW2573899163

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.