ArticlePorcine health management2015
Field efficacy study of a novel ready-to-use vaccine against mycoplasma hyopneumoniae and porcine circovirus type 2 in a Greek farm.
Article in Porcine health management, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- A randomized controlled study on the efficacy of a novel combination vaccine against enzootic pneumonia (Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae) and porcine Circovirus type 2 (PCV2) in the presence of strong maternally derived PCV2 immunity in pigs.BMC veterinary research · 2017Trial
- Immunogenicity and efficacy of a Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae/porcine circovirus type 2 combination vaccine against experimental Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae infection in pigs.Veterinary research · 2026Article
- Efficacy and Safety Evaluation of a Ready-to-Use Bivalent Porcine Circovirus Type 2 andVaccines · 2025Article
- Efficacy of a new ready-to-use PCV2 andVeterinarni medicina · 2025Article
- Efficacy and safety of intradermal vaccination against porcine circovirus type 2 and Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae under combined exposure field conditions.Porcine health management · 2025Article
- Evaluation of porcine circovirus type 2 double vaccination in weaning piglets that reared for gilts under field conditions.Veterinary research forum : an international quarterly journal · 2023Article
- Efficacy Studies against PCV-2 of a New Trivalent Vaccine including PCV-2a and PCV-2b Genotypes andVaccines · 2022Article
- Article
- Review
- Comparison ofPorcine health management · 2020Article
- Field evaluation of a ready-to-use combinedPorcine health management · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe primary objective of this study was to assess the efficacy, under field conditions, of a novel ready-to use
resultsVaccination significantly reduced lesions of craneo-ventral pulmonary consolidation in vaccinated group [expressed as lung lesion score (LLS)] (Mixed model ANOVA:
conclusionsThe test product was considered effective in the face of average MDA, based on significantly reduced severity of LLS and PCV2 viral load, as well as improved ADWG in vaccinated versus control pigs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.