Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28405268›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2017

Revisiting the phylogeny of

Yao Ma, Wan-Jun Chen, Zhao-Hui Li, Feng Zhang, Yan Gao, Yun-Xia Luan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Royal Society open science · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. The mitochondrial genome of a minute springtail speciesMitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Diminutive, degraded but dissimilar:Microbial genomics · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
  15. The Wolbachia Symbiont: Here, There and Everywhere.Results and problems in cell differentiation · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Revisiting the phylogeny ofEcology and evolution · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Yao MaKey Laboratory of Insect Developmental and Evolutionary Biology Institute of Plant Physiology and Ecology Shanghai Institutes for Biological Sciences Chinese Academy of Sciences Shanghai China; University of Chinese Academy of Sciences Beijing China.
Wan-Jun ChenKey Laboratory of Insect Developmental and Evolutionary Biology Institute of Plant Physiology and Ecology Shanghai Institutes for Biological Sciences Chinese Academy of Sciences Shanghai China.
Zhao-Hui LiInstitute of Applied Ecology Nanjing Xiaozhuang University Nanjing China.
Feng ZhangDepartment of Entomology College of Plant Protection Nanjing Agriculture University Nanjing China.
Yan GaoKey Laboratory of Insect Developmental and Evolutionary Biology Institute of Plant Physiology and Ecology Shanghai Institutes for Biological Sciences Chinese Academy of Sciences Shanghai China.
Yun-Xia LuanKey Laboratory of Insect Developmental and Evolutionary Biology Institute of Plant Physiology and Ecology Shanghai Institutes for Biological Sciences Chinese Academy of Sciences Shanghai China.ORCID 0000-0003-3573-7144
Chinese Academy of Sciences · CNNanjing Agricultural University · CNNanjing Xiaozhuang University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The endosymbiont

Indexed as

Collembolagenetic divergencemonophyletic originmultilocus sequence typingsupergroup EWolbachia

Identifiers

PMID28405268
PMCPMC5383468
OpenAlexW2587008888

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.