Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28405258›Full record

ArticleBiomicrofluidics2017

Rapid isolation of blood plasma using a cascaded inertial microfluidic device.

M Robinson, H Marks, T Hinsdale, K Maitland, G Coté

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomicrofluidics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

M RobinsonDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Texas A&M University , College Station, Texas 77843, USA.
H MarksDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Texas A&M University , College Station, Texas 77843, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7407-2582
T HinsdaleDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Texas A&M University , College Station, Texas 77843, USA.
G Coté

Funding

TARGETED GENOMICS FACILITY COREP30ES023512 · NIEHS · TEXAS A&M AGRILIFE RESEARCH · PI DEUTZ, NICOLAAS E · 2014 to 2017
$3.3M
Portable nanofluidic aptamer-SERS instrument for measurement of chemical exposureR44ES022303 · NIEHS · BIOTEX, INC. · PI JACKSON, GEORGE W · 2016 to 2017
$1.4M
NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES023512NIEHS NIH HHS R44 ES022303
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Blood, saliva, mucus, sweat, sputum, and other biological fluids are often hindered in their ability to be used in point-of-care (POC) diagnostics because their assays require some form of off-site sample pre-preparation to effectively separate biomarkers from larger components such as cells. The rapid isolation, identification, and quantification of proteins and other small molecules circulating in the blood plasma from larger interfering molecules are therefore particularly important factors for optical blood diagnostic tests, in particular, when using optical approaches that incur spectroscopic interference from hemoglobin-rich red blood cells (RBCs). In this work, a sequential spiral polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) microfluidic device for rapid (∼1 min) on-chip blood cell separation is presented. The chip utilizes Dean-force induced migration via two 5-loop Archimedean spirals in series. The chip was characterized in its ability to filter solutions containing fluorescent beads and silver nanoparticles and further using blood solutions doped with a fluorescent protein. Through these experiments, both cellular and small molecule behaviors in the chip were assessed. The results exhibit an average RBC separation efficiency of ∼99% at a rate of 5.2 × 10

Identifiers

PMID28405258
PMCPMC5367146

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.