Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28405185›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in neuroscience2017

Motor Stereotypies: A Pathophysiological Review.

Zsanett Péter, Melody E Oliphant, Thomas V Fernandez

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 97 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Tics in patients with encephalitis.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Behavioral Physiology of the CNTNAP2 Knockout Mouse.HSOA trends in anatomy and physiology · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Clinical heterogeneity in patients with myoclonus associated to COVID-19.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2022
    Article
  20. Repetitive Thoughts and Repetitive Behaviors in Williams Syndrome.Journal of autism and developmental disorders · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Zsanett PéterDepartment of Biology, Sewanee: The University of the SouthSewanee, TN, USA; Department of Chemistry, Sewanee: The University of the SouthSewanee, TN, USA.
Melody E OliphantYale Child Study Center, Yale University School of Medicine New Haven, CT, USA.
Thomas V FernandezDepartment of Psychiatry, Yale Child Study Center, Yale University School of Medicine New Haven, CT, USA.
Yale University · USSewanee: The University of the South · US

Funding

Research Training for Medical Students & Physician-Scientists in Child PsychiatryR25MH077823 · NIMH · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI ANDRES S MARTIN · 2006 to 2026
$4.0M
NIMH NIH HHS L40 MH081784NIMH NIH HHS R25 MH077823
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Motor stereotypies are common, repetitive, rhythmic movements with typical onset in early childhood. While most often described in children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and intellectual disability (ID), stereotypies can also present without developmental delay and persist into adulthood. Stereotypies are often disruptive and harmful, both physically and socially, and effective evidence-based treatments are lacking. This can be attributed, in part, to our incomplete knowledge of the underlying biological and environmental risk. Several studies implicate various neurotransmitters, brain circuits, anatomical loci, and pre- and post-natal environmental influences in stereotypy onset and symptom severity. However, there are few points of convergence among a relatively small number of studies, indicating that more research is needed to confirm the underlying bases of risk. Of particular note is the lack of published genetic studies of stereotypies, despite evidence for Mendelian inheritance patterns in some families. Focusing future studies on typically-developing children with primary motor stereotypies may be a useful approach to minimize potential biological, environmental, and genetic heterogeneity that could theoretically hinder consistent findings. Ultimately, a deeper understanding of the underlying biology and risk factors for motor stereotypies will lead us closer to more effective targeted therapies that will alleviate suffering in affected children.

Indexed as

acetylcholinebrain imagingdopamineenvironmentGABAgeneticsmotor stereotypiespharmacotherapy

Identifiers

PMID28405185
PMCPMC5370241
OpenAlexW2602025568

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.