Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28405019›Full record

ArticleNature2017

Rad51-mediated double-strand break repair and mismatch correction of divergent substrates.

Ranjith Anand, Annette Beach, Kevin Li, James Haber

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 95 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
95citing papers in PubMed
8.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

95 citing papers in PubMed, 161 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Mechanisms That Govern Recombinase Fidelity Control During Eukaryotic Homologous Recombination.BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Mutations and structural variants arising during double-strand break repair.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

35 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ranjith AnandRosenstiel Basic Medical Sciences Research Center and Department of Biology, Brandeis University, Waltham, Massachusetts 02454-9110, USA.
Annette BeachRosenstiel Basic Medical Sciences Research Center and Department of Biology, Brandeis University, Waltham, Massachusetts 02454-9110, USA.
Kevin LiRosenstiel Basic Medical Sciences Research Center and Department of Biology, Brandeis University, Waltham, Massachusetts 02454-9110, USA.
James HaberRosenstiel Basic Medical Sciences Research Center and Department of Biology, Brandeis University, Waltham, Massachusetts 02454-9110, USA.
Brandeis University · US

Funding

Recombination Mechanisms in Yeast Cell DifferentiationR37GM020056 · NIGMS · BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY · PI HABER, JAMES E · 2007 to 2016
$5.5M
Analysis of Break-Induced ReplicationR01GM076020 · NIGMS · BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY · PI HABER, JAMES E · 2006 to 2017
$3.4M
RECOMBINATION MECHANISMS IN YEAST CELL DIFFERENTIATIONR01GM020056 · NIGMS · BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY · PI HABER, JAMES E · 1985 to 2006
$3.4M
Enantioselective Synthesis of an Azabicyclic Ring System by a Dynamic Kinetic ResF32GM096690 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI MAY, TRICIA LEE · 2011 to 2012
$83k
NIGMS NIH HHS F32 GM096690NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM020056NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM076020NIGMS NIH HHS R37 GM020056NIH HHS GM20056
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Rad51 (also known as RecA) family of recombinases executes the critical step in homologous recombination: the search for homologous DNA to serve as a template during the repair of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs). Although budding yeast Rad51 has been extensively characterized in vitro, the stringency of its search and sensitivity to mismatched sequences in vivo remain poorly defined. Here, in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, we analysed Rad51-dependent break-induced replication in which the invading DSB end and its donor template share a 108-base-pair homology region and the donor carries different densities of single-base-pair mismatches. With every eighth base pair mismatched, repair was about 14% of that of completely homologous sequences. With every sixth base pair mismatched, repair was still more than 5%. Thus, completing break-induced replication in vivo overcomes the apparent requirement for at least 6-8 consecutive paired bases that has been inferred from in vitro studies. When recombination occurs without a protruding nonhomologous 3' tail, the mismatch repair protein Msh2 does not discourage homeologous recombination. However, when the DSB end contains a 3' protruding nonhomologous tail, Msh2 promotes the rejection of mismatched substrates. Mismatch correction of strand invasion heteroduplex DNA is strongly polar, favouring correction close to the DSB end. Nearly all mismatch correction depends on the proofreading activity of DNA polymerase-δ, although the repair proteins Msh2, Mlh1 and Exo1 influence the extent of correction.

Indexed as

DNA Breaks, Double-StrandedDNA Mismatch RepairRecombinational DNA RepairBase PairingBase SequenceDNA, FungalDNA Polymerase IIIDNA ReplicationExodeoxyribonucleasesMutL Protein Homolog 1MutS Homolog 2 ProteinNucleic Acid HeteroduplexesRad51 RecombinaseSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsSequence Homology, Nucleic AcidDNA, FungalDNA Polymerase IIIexodeoxyribonuclease IExodeoxyribonucleasesMLH1 protein, S cerevisiaeMSH2 protein, S cerevisiaeMutL Protein Homolog 1MutS Homolog 2 ProteinNucleic Acid HeteroduplexesRAD51 protein, S cerevisiaeRad51 RecombinaseSaccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins

Identifiers

PMID28405019
PMCPMC5544500
OpenAlexW2607341326

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.