Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28404938›Full record

SynthesisOncotarget2017

A meta-analytic review of the relationship of cancer coping self-efficacy with distress and quality of life.

Andrea Chirico, Fabio Lucidi, Thomas Merluzzi, Fabio Alivernini, Michelino De Laurentiis, Gerardo Botti, Antonio Giordano

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readMeta-AnalysisReview
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Oncotarget, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 103 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
103citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05349227 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Comprehensive Outcomes for After Cancer Health (COACH): the Feasibility and Impact of an MHealth Augmented Coaching Program for Self-Management in Cancer Survivors

TypeinterventionalSponsorPack HealthRan2022 to 2027Enrolled625ConditionsOvarian Cancer, Breast Cancer, Lung Cancer, Gastric CancerArmsDigital Health Coaching Program, Fitbit
NCT05576545 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Develop and Evaluate the Effectiveness of a Self-Care Smartphone Application on the Self-Efficacy, and Resilience Among Newly Diagnosed Breast Cancer Patients Undergoing Treatment

TypeinterventionalSponsorKaohsiung Medical University Chung-Ho Memorial HospitalRan2020 to 2022Enrolled73ConditionsBreast Cancer, Breast Neoplasm, Breast Malignant Tumor, ResilienceArmsThe Breast Cancer Self-Care App
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

103 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Informational support for depression and quality of life improvements in older patients with cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022
    Pooled it
  3. Self-efficacy in symptom management for adolescents and young adults with cancer: a systematic review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2021
    Pooled it
  4. Experience of women with breast cancer undergoing chemotherapy: a systematic review of qualitative research.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2021
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Quality of life and appraisal factors of patients with advanced cancer and their family caregivers.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Evaluating a shared care pathway intervention for people receiving chemotherapy to reduce post-treatment unplanned hospital presentations: a randomised controlled trial.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. The effect of a group cognitive behavioral therapy on the quality of life and emotional disturbance of women with breast cancer.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022
    Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Article
  20. Article

43 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Andrea ChiricoDepartment of Developmental and Social Psychology, University "La Sapienza" of Rome, Italy.
Fabio LucidiDepartment of Developmental and Social Psychology, University "La Sapienza" of Rome, Italy.
Thomas MerluzziDepartment of Psychology, University of Notre Dame, Indiana, USA.
Fabio AliverniniNational Institute for the Evaluation of the Education System, Rome, Italy.
Michelino De LaurentiisDipartimento di Senologia, SC Oncologia Meduca Senologica, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione "G. Pascale", Italy.
Gerardo BottiDipartimento di Patologia Diagnostica e di Laboratorio: SC di Anatomia Patologica e Citopatologia, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione "G. Pascale", Naples, Italy.
Antonio GiordanoSbarro Health Research Organization, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Self-efficacy for coping with cancer is a specific construct that refers to behaviors that occur in the course of dealing with a cancer diagnosis, cancer treatments, and transitioning to survivorship. One of the more widely used measures of self-efficacy for coping strategies with cancer is the Cancer Behavior Inventory. The following general questions provide a framework for this research: 1. Is self-efficacy for coping with cancer related to distress and quality of life of a cancer patient?. 2. Do self-efficacy for coping with cancer and the target psychological outcomes (i.e., distress and quality of life) change in longitudinal studies, with or without intervention? One-hundred eighty studies cited the different versions of the Cancer Behavior Inventory and 47 used the scale. Result showed an inverse relationship between self-efficacy for coping with cancer and distress, and a positive relationship between self-efficacy for coping with cancer and Quality of Life, both with a large effect size. The strong relationship of self-efficacy and outcomes, resulted of the specificity of the instrument, which targets specific coping strategies that are closely aligned with positive outcomes in adjusting to cancer. However, the results are consistent with the theory, which states that compared to those with low efficacy, highly efficacious people demonstrate less anxiety and better adjustment in stressful situations and consistent with prior results in which self-efficacy is positively related to quality of life.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PsychologicalQuality of LifeSelf EfficacyStress, PsychologicalCross-Sectional StudiesHumansLongitudinal StudiesNeoplasmsSurveys and Questionnairescancercopingmeta-analysisquality of lifeself-efficacy

Identifiers

PMID28404938
PMCPMC5482699

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.