ArticleOncotarget2017
Genetic polymorphisms are associated with the risk of gastric and colorectal cancers in a Han Chinese population.
Article in Oncotarget, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Hotspots and trends of risk factors in gastric cancer: A visualization and bibliometric analysis.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Here, we genotyped eleven single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and evaluated their association with the risk of developing gastric cancer (GC) or colorectal cancer (CRC) in 1,790 Han Chinese participants (588 GC patients, 499 CRC patients, and 703 healthy controls). Statistically analysis showed that the "C" allele of rs2689154 in MIPEPP2 was associated with a decreased risk of GC (odds ratio [OR] = 0.81, 95 % confidence interval [CI]: 0.66-0.99, P = 0.041), whereas the "T" allele of rs12615966 in LOC284998 was associated with a 1.29-fold increase in the risk of GC (OR = 1.29, 95% CI: 1.03-1.63, P = 0.029). Additionally, genetic model analyses showed that rs2689154 was associated with a reduced risk of GC under the recessive model (adjusted OR = 0.46, 95% CI: 0.22-0.98, P = 0.037), and rs12615966 in FOXF1 was associated with an increased risk of GC in both the dominant and log-additive models after adjusted for age and gender (adjusted OR = 1.36, 95% CI: 1.02-1.81, P = 0.033; adjusted OR = 1.36, 95% CI: 1.05-1.75, P = 0.018, respectively). We also observed that rs2178146 in FOXF1 was associated with an increased risk of CRC in the recessive model (adjusted OR = 1.90, 95% CI: 1.05-3.45, P = 0.034). Our results confirmed that rs2689154 in MIPEPP2 was significantly decreased GC risk, but rs12615966 in LOC284998 was significantly increased GC risk, and rs2178146 in FOXF1 was associated with increased CRC risk in the Han Chinese population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.