ReviewJournal of the Royal Society, Interface2017
Enhancing regenerative approaches with nanoparticles.
Review in Journal of the Royal Society, Interface, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
30 citing papers in PubMed, 111 citations in OpenAlex.
- Topical treatment of diabetic foot ulcers using a novel quercetin-loaded hyaluosome gel nanoformulation.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Multiscale metal-based nanocomposites for bone and joint disease therapies.Materials today. Bio · 2025Review
- Current Therapeutic Strategies of Intervertebral Disc Regenerative Medicine.Molecular diagnosis & therapy · 2024Review
- Recent Advances in Micro- and Nano-Drug Delivery Systems Based on Natural and Synthetic Biomaterials.Polymers · 2023Review
- Engineered Extracellular Vesicles for Drug Delivery in Therapy of Stroke.Pharmaceutics · 2023Review
- Nanoparticle Synthesis and Their Integration into Polymer-Based Fibers for Biomedical Applications.Biomedicines · 2023Review
- Drug Delivery Systems in Regenerative Medicine: An Updated Review.Pharmaceutics · 2023Review
- Recent Advances in the Biomedical Applications of Functionalized Nanogels.Pharmaceutics · 2022Review
- Emerging Magnetic Fabrication Technologies Provide Controllable Hierarchically-Structured Biomaterials and Stimulus Response for Biomedical Applications.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2022Review
- Tumor necrosis factor-alpha antibody labeled-polyethylene glycol-coated nanoparticles: A mesenchymal stem cells-based drug delivery system in the rat model of cisplatin-induced nephrotoxicity.Veterinary world · 2022Article
- Electrospun Biomimetic Nanofibrous Scaffolds: A Promising Prospect for Bone Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Self-Assembled Nanoscale Materials for Neuronal Regeneration: A Focus on BDNF Protein and Nucleic Acid Biotherapeutic Delivery.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Nanotechnology-Assisted Cell Tracking.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Calcium Phosphate-Coated and Strontium-Incorporated Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles Can Effectively Induce Osteogenic Stem Cell Differentiation.Advanced healthcare materials · 2022Article
- Hydrogels: 3D Drug Delivery Systems for Nanoparticles and Extracellular Vesicles.Biomedicines · 2021Review
- Importance of Surface Topography in Both Biological Activity and Catalysis of Nanomaterials: Can Catalysis by Design Guide Safe by Design?International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- Resistance and Adaptation of Bacteria to Non-Antibiotic Antibacterial Agents: Physical Stressors, Nanoparticles, and Bacteriophages.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Injectable, self-healing mesoporous silica nanocomposite hydrogels with improved mechanical properties.Nanoscale · 2021Article
- Studies of nanoparticle delivery withBioactive materials · 2020Review
- Use of nanoparticles in skeletal tissue regeneration and engineering.Histology and histopathology · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this review, we discuss recent developments in the field of nanoparticles and their use in tissue regeneration approaches. Owing to their unique chemical properties and flexibility in design, nanoparticles can be used as drug delivery systems, to create novel features within materials or as bioimaging agents, or indeed these properties can be combined to create smart multifunctional structures. This review aims to provide an overview of this research field where the focus will be on nanoparticle-based strategies to stimulate bone regeneration; however, the same principles can be applied for other tissue and organ regeneration strategies. In the first section, nanoparticle-based methods for the delivery of drugs, growth factors and genetic material to promote tissue regeneration are discussed. The second section deals with the addition of nanoparticles to materials to create nanocomposites. Such materials can improve several material properties, including mechanical stability, biocompatibility and biological activity. The third section will deal with the emergence of a relatively new field of research using nanoparticles in advanced cell imaging and stem cell tracking approaches. As the development of nanoparticles continues, incorporation of this technology in the field of regenerative medicine will ultimately lead to new tools that can diagnose, track and stimulate the growth of new tissues and organs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.